Anyone laugh at this

JR,
Leo can not get into a rental car reservation system without warrent for a specific person and have a specific reason.
Having Illinois plates in Alaska is not a reason.
Let alone fishing for data? Nope.

This is why leo trys to hammer hotels, when fishing.

JR there's numourous settled lawsuits on these issues and you are wrong.

If a license plate reader hits a car that the guest visitor owns. That's a direct link to rw.

Your hospital story is not valid for this discussion. Of course exigent circumstances will open files. But those situations do not involve hobby.

JR,
Leo can not get into a rental car reservation system without warrent for a specific person and have a specific reason.
Having Illinois plates in Alaska is not a reason.
Let alone fishing for data? Nope.

This is why leo trys to hammer hotels, when fishing.

JR there's numourous settled lawsuits on these issues and you are wrong.

If a license plate reader hits a car that the guest visitor owns. That's a direct link to rw.

Your hospital story is not valid for this discussion. Of course exigent circumstances will open files. But those situations do not involve hobby. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Carp,

You missed the point. "Can Not" means it is impossible. "May Not" means it is not permitted.

There is a lot of information that the police get by just by request, sometimes by a simple phone call. In my example it was just a telephone request to the rental company that told them who the guy was, and everything the rental company had.

I offer the suggestion: most people want to cooperate, in every way, with the police; it is more than you would believe. They can always ask! Only a few, so very few, will say no.

That must scare you.

Jr
Again, you're wrong.
You're example was there's been an accident.
It's not oh pretty please I want your customer data.