Encounter: Smurfy tummy damage

I appreciate the honest review. I have seen her, and knowing what to expect ahead of time I opted for an extended CW with PM session. I nearly went blind at the end when my eyes rolled back, and the sight of those gorgeous eyes looking at me as she gobbled me up was heavenly.

She's also a very interesting person and a great conversationalist. Plus I've never let a girl peg me but for Smurfy I might be convinced!

Smurfy has caught my attention in the past and I do think she is pretty ( great eyes ) . From the descriptions it seems like the plan should be to just have her keep her clothes on and L2 with PM until your head explodes.

Exactly right player. I remember thinking of this photo as she was getting started!

Exactly right player. I remember thinking of this photo as she was getting started!

Originally Posted by Brandofan

What's my age again?

After years and years and 100s of encounters, I am much more attracted to good attitude and great performance than to a perfect tight body. Smurfy was great for me. Originally Posted by Blue Moon Man

This is also why I see her. We have a great roleplay scenario going on. I have her wear sexy dresses and she looks great in them. Many times, I just hike her dress up, pull her panties to the side, and leave her heels on, and the tummy is not even an issue. With the roleplay, she fucks your mind as well and your cock. As I get older, this is more important for me.

Having said that, WALDT and I respect the OP's opinion. For anyone reading this and doing their research, she is not a 20 year old hardbody and not even a Winter Kay or the like. If that is what you are looking for, it would be best to look elsewhere.

I use to see her a few years back. Did a doubles with her and Piper Leone, whew, they liked to kill me. She also went by the name of Jessica Tearwell back then (just love that name). She had less damage back then, as we all did. I saw for her talents, she would do pretty much anything I ask. Thanks for the review.

I think it's pretty pervasive in the hobby. A lot...the vast majority of girls hobby because they are moms and it's good money and a way to prevent having to pay expensive day-care. Like has been mentioned above, the girls are super busy and don't generally have "workout" routines. Plus, other skills more than make-up for some bumps. It's not a 'petty complaint". There are girls out there with flawless bodies, just be prepared to pay A LOT to see them. Originally Posted by wizzbang

Ruby Reid has a flawless body and is $200/hhour $300/h. Being 21 works a lot better than diet and exercise for a lot of women.

I had a really great time with her a couple of years back. Her pussy was one of the wettest I had ever felt. And that was just from kissing. The whole session was great, with great IOP and she would orgasm herself to almost seizing. However, the mommy damage was some of the worst I had ever seen. I had such a good time, I never wanted to mention it, because it wouldn't stop me from seeing her again. Just be aware that it is more than just a little bit of mommy damage.

After years and years and 100s of encounters, I am much more attracted to good attitude and great performance than to a perfect tight body. Smurfy was great for me. Originally Posted by Blue Moon Man

I think your comment carries the day for me. I'm gonna give her a chance for my business soon.
And don't forget Bald Bryan's stupendous review over on the ad site. He needs to repost those pics over here. Hair, eyes, and face. I think she could hypnotize me just by my gazing into her eyes and petting that beautiful hair..


#12 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time.