Please reread the original quote; it does not say more than one roundround...the "count" actually starts at 20 and is undefined. Not arguing gun rights per se, but am pointing out hysterical hyperbole by zealots. The are a lot of "guns" already illegal for most private citizens. Big difference between limitations (some exist today) and outright ban. Obfuscation at its finest. Originally Posted by reddog1951I was just being sarcastic about one round, 10,20 it doesn't matter. It isn't up to Joe Biden to determine the number of Rounds a Firearm is capable of Firing. Under a pressing situation even a well trained person's accuracy will suffer, multiple rounds maybe quite necessary.
From the thread starter post:yes, biden actually said this about banning handguns. re-read in red.
"Biden responded. “The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether it’s a, whether it’s a 9mm pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous.”.....
“I’m continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things, but I’m not likely to get that done in the near term,” Biden added."
...."Whether it’s a nine millimeter pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous. I’m continuing to push the elimination of a sale of those things. But I’m not likely to get that done in the near term."
From Oeb:
"Joe Biden says he wants to ban handguns..."
Big inflammatory leap in "logic" there. The Biden quote clearly questions the need for weapons that can fire multiple rounds of some undefined number starting at 20. The quote does not support an intent to ban all handguns. Originally Posted by reddog1951
Biden Just Said He Wants to Ban HandgunsJust remove the "Hand" and you'll get his real focus with one exception: