Snopes is for dopes!!!!

Yeah, the Gospil of Libtards is crumbling under its own lies!!!


https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/0...ecking-engine/

Even Snopes can’t fact check this article. Because they will be gone. And Libtards here have the balls to criticize sources. You’ve been had. And exposed Originally Posted by bambino

The following Clip is the only thing you can say about those that trust Snopes.


https://youtu.be/BCstmBw-2oU

To be clear:

Snopes did not post incorrect data.

One of the founders, and others, used material from other sources, without attributing it to those sources.

They posted the truth, but pretended it was info they had found, rather than found by others. Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Thank you. I was about to make a similar post.

What David Mikkelson did was wrong. Plagiarism cannot be justifeed.

In a statement, Mikkelson acknowledged he had engaged in “multiple serious copyright violations of content that Snopes didn’t have rights to use” and praised the work of the 20 or so “dedicated, professional journalists” employed by Snopes.


But nowhere does anyone state that the conclusions reached by Snopes in their fact checking where plagiarism was involved were incorrect.

DPST minions gotta follow teh communist narrative of teh DPST party -

Standing in to defend the Marxist manifesto - Cheers for SR!!!!!!


let's hear it - SR - for don lemon, rachel madcow, Psucki, stelter, andall teh Liars of teh DPST LSM that stand for abrogation of history. truth , Facts, and teh american Way


marxist narrative Uber alles/

Maybe they can "wrap speed and vaccine" for TDS/DPST

Snopes is as fake as Joey Bribes

Snopes is as fake as Joey Bribes Originally Posted by bambino

Neither is fake. Clearly what you post is.

But nowhere does anyone state that the conclusions reached by Snopes in their fact checking where plagiarism was involved were incorrect. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Do you honestly think they'd devalue their own work product or their own stolen work product? lol...

Do you honestly think they'd devalue their own work product or their own stolen work product? lol... Originally Posted by texassapper

I ask you to go into any of Snopes investigations and conclusions and tell me incorrect conclusions they'e reached. Not conclusions that you disagree with but conclusions that are incorrect.

Snopes

When misinformation obscures the truth and readers don’t know what to trust, Snopes.com’s fact checking and original, investigative reporting lights the way to evidence-based and contextualized analysis. We always document our sources so readers are empowered to do independent research and make up their own minds. Snopes got its start in 1994, investigating urban legends, hoaxes, and folklore. Founder David Mikkelson, later joined by his wife, was publishing online before most people were connected to the internet. As demand for reliable fact checks grew, so did Snopes. Now it’s the oldest and largest fact-checking site online, widely regarded by journalists, folklorists, and readers as an invaluable research companion.

https://library.csi.cuny.edu/c.php?g=619342&p=4310783

[B]Snopes Is Extremely Well Regarded with Other Fact-Checking Sites

Fact-checking websites are important. Vital even, as regular internet users attempt to figure out what is real news and what is misinformation. Even though there are numerous fact-checking sites available, almost all rate Snopes as one of the best fact-checking options around.

In short: Snopes is not fake news.

Several studies from various independent researchers include Snopes in their most trusted fact-checking site lists. Checking the independence of those sources is another story, but the majority include reasoning and methodology for their selections. This allows you to further verify Snopes as well as other fact-checking websites.[/B]

https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-sno...ased-reliable/

The 8 Best Fact-Checking Sites for Finding Unbiased Truth

This is the age of misinformation and fake news. Here are the best unbiased fact-checking sites so that you can find the truth.

2. Snopes


https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/true-5...king-websites/

Yes, Snopes leans to the liberal side. Yes, Snopes investigated Trump's statements many times, but Trump made many more controversial statements than any POTUS in history. He put himself out there.

The bottom line is Trump supporters will doubt any fact checking organization since the organizations reach conclusions that Trump supporters dislike.

The NY Post says so.
Businessinsider.com says so.
The Dailymail says so.
Seattle times says so.
Forbes says so.
The Washington Post says so.
USA today says so...

Should I go on? Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Yes go on about ALL pissant's successes...take all the time you like. I'm sure snops will help you.
Good thing you're not trapped in Afghanistan like the 10's of thousands of our Americans that most likely will be tortured and beheaded...THANKS Mr PISSANT and your colony of misfits!!

Neither is fake. Clearly what you post is. Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

You're right...pissant is a REAL fraud...nothing fake about that.
Most countries around the world find this dementia ridden clown as REAL incompetent as they come!!

https://www.poynter.org/fact-checkin...on-for-months/

Mikkelson is misleading people to donate to his go fund me account. Once a liar always a liar.