Human Trafficking and The Federal Government?

Okay! Complicit? Like the Texas abortion law that was struck down?

I'm starting to understand. The State should not be involved. Like us citizens. When it comes to an illegal act. Am I making a leap? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Like the Texas abortion law that was allowed to stand for now.

I would point out that in Texas, property owners may defend themselves, and their property, from trespassers wirth deadly force if necessary.

State aqnd local authorities may assist at the request of the property owner.

Texas is now re-enforcing existing physical barriers , and building new ones, along the border . . . . with the enthusiastic pe3rmission of private land owners.

Drugs guns etc Open Borders Hmm

I wonder how you'll play this stupid statement down? Go. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

95 - have you learned Nothing from playing piccolo in eh 'Band'???


referring to another poster as 'Stupid' - is inappropriate and Rude.

Not that those reality descriptions bother self-described 'trolls'.

Shameful!

Open the borders ,,, that's gonna help ,,,,

If there was an easier way to enter the country, would she have taken it? To cross an ocean and land ashore is not exactly undetectable.

I must disclose that my lineage has been on this hemisphere since the "discovery" of the west. So our perspectives do not coalesce. Think of the other Ellis Island. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Actually, our respective family heritages do codeless in terms of centuries of oppression and even genocide. My people, on my father's side, were Eastern European Jews. Half his extended family did not survive the Holocaust. The grandmother in question did (somehow) survive a concentration camp and the following Communist occupation.

So my guess is that there is a good bit of commonality of experience between my extended family history and yours.

************

The point of that "full disclosure" statement is that my people enterted the country legally, with papers and became citizens within the way normal for their era.

Texas is now re-enforcing existing physical barriers , and building new ones, along the border . . . . with the enthusiastic pe3rmission of private land owners. Originally Posted by ICU 812

I have no problem with private land owners building walls on their own land.

I do have a problem with the government seizing private land to build a wall or private land owners requesting public money for a wall to be built on their land.

I have no problem with private land owners building walls on their own land.

I do have a problem with the government seizing private land to build a wall or private land owners requesting public money for a wall to be built on their land. Originally Posted by WTF

so as long as its not at the border, right?

Check out Ft. Worth Texas. 115 people arrested for alleged "human trafficking". A felony charge.

I have no problem with private land owners building walls on their own land.

I do have a problem with the government seizing private land to build a wall or private land owners requesting public money for a wall to be built on their land. Originally Posted by WTF

My understanding was that the landowners welcome state assistance in building the barriers.

I don't think Texas is using eminent domain to tke control of the land. The land remains the property of the owner. They ask for permission and the land owners most often agree.

Check out Ft. Worth Texas. 115 people arrested for alleged "human trafficking". A felony charge. Originally Posted by VitaMan

No reference - no substantiation - as usual per DPST Xinn Lies.

They were all 'White supremacists ' - guilty of crimes against teh marxist, racist fiden communist state -

Right - VM!!!!!

Yep, he acknowledged there were problems and he put someone down there to solve them. He also started building the wall which was working until Joe came along. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Revisionist history.