Not Guilty on all counts

Attachment 877550

I hope there are no "peaceful protests" ! Originally Posted by winn dixie

and now for the weather
riots mixed with snow tonight

next week
news outlets in court to pay big bucks and well more snow and riots

Actually it was a bunch of numbnutted right wingers crying about a supposed guilty verdict.

And crying about riots to follow if not guilty.

Well, like I said he probably wasn't going to get convicted and I still say there will be little to no protesting. Be lame and tame if there even is any.

But all you Chicken Little's...Shelter and keep us posted of your poops.

Do you fucking people ever look back and see that wtf you are saying today, is nothing like wtf you said yesterday?

As it should be.

Do you fucking people ever look back and see that what wtf is saying today, is nothing like what wtf said yesterday? Originally Posted by WTF

We do. Constantly.

Actually it was a bunch of numbnutted right wingers crying about a supposed guilty verdict.

And crying about riots to follow if not guilty.

Well, like I said he probably wasn't going to get convicted and I still say there will be little to no protesting. Be lame and tame if there even is any.

But all you Chicken Little's...Shelter and keep us posted of your poops.

Do you fucking people ever look back and see that wtf you are saying today, is nothing like wtf you said yesterday? Originally Posted by WTF

do you?

We do. Constantly. Originally Posted by lustylad

GFY and stop changing people's text like a little child.

Go practice spouting your partisan political economic bullshit. Tiny seems to love it.

Sorry Tiny...you're one of the better posters but lustylad either has something of yours you want back or is directly seated in a blindspot. He is a partisan hack who tries to pass off cliche'ish outbursts as economic theory.

Maybe you realize he needs a friend and you like to throw the ole boy a bone. I'm just not that nice.

do you? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I said early on it looked like he would walk. Especially after the Judge got rid of the weapons charge.

I also have said there will be no rioting.

1-0. No problem. I’ve come back from worse. Isn’t your scorecard like 1B1 60 to HF 1 from the Trump suits.


Nope, but maybe you being so new to the forum ( sarcasm ) you don't know what I said and didn't say. For your edification, my position from the beginning, was that Trump and his attorneys, misguided or not, had the legal right to bring these suits and that I would be interested to hear their arguments in court. I then spoke against Sydney Powell when she went off the rails even though I praised her in the matter of General Flynn's defense.


I never once said that I believed that the election was stolen, that there was massive fraud. I said that I would wait to hear the evidence. I also reminded the readers that it was Democrats who first brought up the "problems" with the Dominion voting machines. So no, you have misinterpreted what I said. The question is, where you not aware of my position that you just misrepresented or you were aware and just didn't care because that's how you and your twin 1bm1, roll.




I don’t think I have much to be concerned about though reaching his level might take a while. Maybe he’ll return someday. Originally Posted by NoirMan

Cute. Since you and 1bm1 are one in the same ( you are not fooling anybody ) you have once again misrepresented the facts as you often do.


I was right on Michael Brown but you know that and that is why you won't respond to my simple request to speak to it. I was right on Trayvon Martin and I was right on Blake which stared this whole Kenosha mess.


I also said that I thought Chauvin would be found guilty even though I believed that Floyd was culpable in his death.


I can't think of a single legal matter that I have gotten wrong.

GFY and stop changing people's text like a little child.

Go practice spouting your partisan political economic bullshit. Tiny seems to love it.

Sorry Tiny...you're one of the better posters but lustylad either has something of yours you want back or is directly seated in a blindspot. He is a partisan hack who tries to pass off cliche'ish outbursts as economic theory.

Maybe you realize he needs a friend and you like to throw the ole boy a bone. I'm just not that nice. Originally Posted by WTF

Why would I waste my time or knowledge trying to explain economic theory to you? I'm perfectly content just exposing you as a complete fraud.

You've never met a "cliche-ish outburst" that you didn't mistake for profundity.

did I prick a prick?

or touch a nerve?

are you upset? Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

First ngiat, now me?

Try taking long, slow, deep breaths.

Now close your eyes and imagine yourself as an economist who someday might actually be taken seriously. Like your mentor Arthur Laffer.

Feel better now?

See how easy it is to avoid a meltdown?

But all you Chicken Little's...Shelter and keep us posted of your poops. Originally Posted by WTF

Or keep an AR handy.

I said early on it looked like he would walk. Especially after the Judge got rid of the weapons charge.

I also have said there will be no rioting. Originally Posted by WTF

not even a few angry "while guilt" pansies? an Antifa skatepunk?

what a jip.

guess we'll just have to settle for the usual far leftist media howler monkeys claiming "white privilege"


bhahahahahaha

Yay my team won!

This guy just has to lay low, let the MSM continue to talk a bunch of slander and write a bunch of libel about him, and collect his defamation lawsuit settlements. He probably also has a civil rights lawsuit against the prosecution, for the stunt they pulled with that video footage.

Cute. Since you and 1bm1 are one in the same ( you are not fooling anybody ) you have once again misrepresented the facts as you often do.


I was right on Michael Brown but you know that and that is why you won't respond to my simple request to speak to it. I was right on Trayvon Martin and I was right on Blake which stared this whole Kenosha mess.


I also said that I thought Chauvin would be found guilty even though I believed that Floyd was culpable in his death.


I can't think of a single legal matter that I have gotten wrong.




Originally Posted by HedonistForever

From what I read you wrote far more than “Trump has a right” it was more along the lines of “evidence of fraud this and evidence of fraud that” and “it’ll be presented in court this” and “supreme will decide that”. But if you say you said “trumps gonna lose because everything the Republican congressman and he and his attys are saying is fake false and bullshit” I missed that. But it’s a lot to read so it may (not) be there.

Anyway, Next you’ll be saying the McMichaels will will walk because it’s self defense there too. At least that’s what he’s claiming as his defense.

Since I’m gonna start sport betting on court cases, please provide me your grand wisdom so we can all make money off your magic ball.