The bio-med Thread: Doesn't like disrespect

Was hoping you'd stick around 9500!
Lots of the band class will be back very soon. Originally Posted by winn dixie

I'm trying; still not pointed out. As far apart as you and Waco are to me on the spectrum, I do love a sense of humor.

Have to admit, I was feeling the juices flowing. By stimulant.

With the news of the committee's subpoena of the penis head (seriously, can't help it), passions will run hot again.

To stay on topic; I had a flash of inspiration when I started this thread. A rebel spirit going after the moderator. Like Crypt keeper or kicker or whatever.

i'm quite sure you weren't the only one. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

ICU got a warning. I had been warned. Thus the points.

... Ca'mon, mate - do be like that.
We can't have EVERYBODY leave.
... How are we gonna have good discussions then?

... Just be careful of yer insults and conduct
- and fer Crikey sake - Don't hijack any threads! ( )

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Your post is much appreciated. This is an open forum. As much as it's annoying as fuck, Ripmany can spout a jewel among the muck. The thread title got me, and then the garbled
OP. Genius!

Anyway, I'll try to tone it down. But when I get going, it's hard to stop. Especially when I'm having fun. Sir.

Mr. Waco RTM is the culprit I’m sure. Poor Biomed likely has a bunch of personal messages from him about people being mean and bullying him. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

I'd believe him in this case. If you go too far, he will RTM. Being mean is one thing, but following the rules here is for everyone.

Got warned: And I'm OK with that.

The last two initials of ECCIE stand for "Information Exchange". No useful purpose is served by dismissing someone's opinion by declaring them to be something (insert disparaging remark) ending with '-tard". This sort of name calling is grade school play ground behavior. ?This is an adult site. Lets all act like adults.

So the, tell us all why and how that opinion is off the mark. That would be is an exchange of ideas. Originally Posted by ICU 812

I'll keep that in mind utill the election. PROPAGANDA.

Self deleted. I'm learning, slowly. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Should I? Respond? Commas make all the difference.

I'm not to keen on poster whose sole purpose seems to trying to get other posters banned. Originally Posted by WTF

Hear hear!

OP, I am not sure what you were pointed for, and I don't care enough to look at your prior posts to figure out why. The person on staff you mention has given plenty of warnings to simply stay on topic and to be respectful to other members.

I normally don't pay much attention to your posts because of all of the gifs and other shit that bores me, but all I can say is if you want to get banned, I assume starting this thread is a good way to get your wish.

Stick around, man. You know what you were pointed for. I don't. Whatever it was for, just don't do it anymore. It's not that complicated. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

I have sources worth passing on here. Sometimes it's nonsense like Pee Wee. Sometimes it's respected archives.

But as I've stated before, I'm the hand up Mona Lisa's skirt. Poking around making her smile. As long as you tune in.

Though I don't think he will, a live television audience as he tries to bullshit his way out of breaking his oath is too irresistible. I would love it if the world was hanging on my every word.


"In case" the FBI or CIA is "watching."

Just dont drunk post 9500

You'll be fine otherwise! lol

Just dont drunk post 9500

You'll be fine otherwise! lol Originally Posted by winn dixie

It's not just drinking, sir. I'm sure you remember my National Sandbox thread?

He's always been like this.
*I* think he was put here as penance for past actions LOL!
But I experienced how he operated awhile ago and he'd shut down the threads trying to cap that eccIE.

But what person in power here doesn't fly cover for favoured ones?

5 points for "unnecessary rudeness"? Has the moderator watched TV nowadays? I guess we will all have to put on dresses and drink sweet tea.

Some guy posts stupid comments and the moderator closes my thread. How does that work? That any piece of shit could just take a dump in a thread and it gets closed. What kind of moderator is this guy? A former WWE referee?

I got pointed for asking corn if he was a Chief fan (Kansas Ciyy). 5 points
?. Someone must hate the Chiefs

Some guy posts stupid comments and the moderator closes my thread. How does that work? That any piece of shit could just take a dump in a thread and it gets closed. What kind of moderator is this guy? A former WWE referee? Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

I forget who but someone besides you didn't like the fact I referred to you as Cornhole.

Members bemoaning their rewards for violations of the Guidelines were sanctioned for violation of one of the Following Guidelines:

• #1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences..
• #3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.
• #4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.
• #6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.

The resolution to stop Staff involvement in the Threads is to post in compliance with ALL of the Guidelines each and every time.

Rudeness and disrespect is in the eye of the beholder. For instance, calling a woman a bitch after she has kicked ass all around the place is more of a compliment than an insult but it has to do with the intention of the person saying it. You non-hackers who didn't serve in the military should make sure that we see your dresses so we don't insult you.

Some guy posts stupid comments and the moderator closes my thread. How does that work? That any piece of shit could just take a dump in a thread and it gets closed. What kind of moderator is this guy? A former WWE referee? Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

LOL! Just saw the thread you are using as reference.

Rudeness and disrespect is in the eye of the beholder. For instance, calling a woman a bitch after she has kicked ass all around the place is more of a compliment than an insult but it has to do with the intention of the person saying it. You non-hackers who didn't serve in the military should make sure that we see your dresses so we don't insult you. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

You got a point there with your first sentence.
But the Court stated: " 1) A thing must be prurient in nature. 2) A thing must be completely devoid of scientific, political, educational, or social value. 3) A thing must violate the local community standards."

We ain't got no social standards on a hooker board

You got a point there with your first sentence.
But the Court stated: " 1) A thing must be prurient in nature. 2) A thing must be completely devoid of scientific, political, educational, or social value. 3) A thing must violate the local community standards."

We ain't got no social standards on a hooker board Originally Posted by Precious_b

you mean i've been posting on a hooker board all these years?

you can't mean that, Captain!


subjective insults is one thing, flagrant is another that should be clear to all. including the poster who intentionally made them.

Is anyone keeping a list of currently banned members ?