Because he can Originally Posted by jmichael
he can, can he then publish it on twitter?
not anymore.
publishing Musk's travel is doxxing. if someone did that to AOC she's scream bloody murder and demand it stopped immediately.You're going too far on cementing the connection. He's got a bot tracking the plane. Not the person. He has no specific info using this method to pull a manifest to know who is on the plane nor is he pretending to know or projecting to know
awhile back Musk offered the guy 5,000 to stop publishing the location.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/30/busin...ter/index.html Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
You're going too far on cementing the connection. He's got a bot tracking the plane. Not the person. He has no specific info using this method to pull a manifest to know who is on the plane nor is he pretending to know or projecting to know
You have no proof of intent, as far as doxxing goes, to show that he is using the info in an attempt to harm, embarrass or intimidate. He's not using it to hold Elon to account. He didn't threaten him, either from what we've seen
Our free speech absolutist head twit, however, has proven quite hypocritical. Including when he took down his poll and reposted a more tailored version when public sentiment had voted him down handily. Originally Posted by HDGristle
You're going too far on cementing the connection. He's got a bot tracking the plane. Not the person. He has no specific info using this method to pull a manifest to know who is on the plane nor is he pretending to know or projecting to know
You have no proof of intent, as far as doxxing goes, to show that he is using the info in an attempt to harm, embarrass or intimidate. He's not using it to hold Elon to account. He didn't threaten him, either from what we've seen
Our free speech absolutist head twit, however, has proven quite hypocritical. Including when he took down his poll and reposted a more tailored version when public sentiment had voted him down handily. Originally Posted by HDGristle
I don't dispute that doxxing is an issue. No one saying Elon needs to be harmed. Or that AoC should be doxxed. Or that MTG should be swatted. I'm against it.
But your logic is comparable to people who blame the gun manufacturer when a person shoots someone
But your own words betray your point. "Isn't directly related" and "Coulda" are why I'm taking issue with your causal conclusion. Originally Posted by HDGristle
I know you don't subscribe to that logic regarding guns, which is why I fed it to you along with the MTG example.
Labelling this as doxxing and using the car incident is the stretch he needed to do what he wanted to do. It's a banal, transparent attempt to power through and accomplish what his $5k offer couldn't so he can pretend he has a legit bitch when he went back on his word.
If he was legitimately concerned about it as doxxing he wouldn't have had to modify the rules to specifically target the kid, after allegedly using the same shadow ban tactics he railed against first, and right after he disbanded the specific oversight group that would have addressed this. Originally Posted by HDGristle
Look up Ella Irwin, and then look at the discussions regarding Jack Sweeney, screenshot and reporting. Elon's going to find thar someone with deep pockets will likely help bankroll the kid if Elon does actually start going after the kid legally. Originally Posted by HDGristle
Has there even been a police report filed for the alleged stalking? Last I heard journalists were getting banned for pointing out this looked like a hoax. Originally Posted by MistersharkNot so far from what I've seen. In fact, one of the guys who reported on that got banned despite not linking to any of the "doxxing"