Biden did the right thing. As usual trump did not

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Tucker's been known to be wrong and loose with the facts. He is after all an opinion commentator and Fox has made the argument that his show is entertainment that no reasonable person would believe. And a federal judge agreed. So maybe a couple grains of salt when he start spinning. And maybe let's look at the totality of the facts and let this play out.

Oh yeah, Hur. Wasn't he a Trump appointee and well liked on both sides of the aisle?

Yeah, that's the guy. Let him do his job and then judge the work. He's not George Santos, swimming in a deep ass pool of lies and embellishment that might even make Trump blush hard enough to add some rosy glow to the bronzer. Originally Posted by HDGristle

did you watch the video? tell me what's false. Carlson the few times he's been wrong has said so. rather rare for a "political hack" yes? when has Joe Scarborough for example ever said he was wrong the many times he said false shit? never.



George Santos has nothing to do with this. stop deflecting.
HDGristle's Avatar
did you watch the video? tell me what's false Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
For the record, I do like you and I do respect you and your style. I don't owe you answers you want, though. I could respond "No, I'm sorry, I'm not your monkey." And that would be sliding in a joke at Tucker's expense and actual deflection.

As for Joe Scarborough, I don't watch him or take any cues from him but if you feel he's a partisan hack I'll agree with you fully so that we can find some common ground. And that's a strawman.

George Santos is an analogy about the kind of guy that Hur isn't. That's not deflection, that's a counterpoint about what someone who has no credibility looks like vs someone who has a history of bipartisan praise.

But most importantly and as it pertains to the topic... the biggest difference between Joe's docs and Trump's is that Joe has been trying to get them back into the right hands and Trump has been trying to claim that those marked docs are his property.

They're not.

Joe's an asshole and a fuckup, no doubt. He mishandled docs, no doubt. But even his senile ass isn't dumb enough to make that claim.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
I don't owe you answers you want, TWK. I could respond "No, I'm sorry, I'm not your monkey." And that would be sliding in a joke at Tucker's expense and actual deflection.

As for Joe Scarborough, I don't watch him or take any cues from him but if you feel he's a partisan hack I'll agree with you fully so that we can find some common ground. And that's a strawman.

George Santos is an analogy about the kind of guy that Hur isn't. That's not deflection, that's a counterpoint about what someone who has no credibility looks like vs someone who has a history of bipartisan praise.

But most importantly and as it pertains to the topic... the biggest difference between Joe's docs and Trump's is that Joe has been trying to get them back into the right hands and Trump has been trying to claim that those marked docs are his property.

They're not.

Joe's an asshole and a fuckup, no doubt. He mishandled docs, no doubt. But even his senile ass isn't dumb enough to make that claim. Originally Posted by HDGristle

so .. you didn't bother to watch Tucker's video .. got it. and they are Trump's property. it will be ruled that the doc's are Biden's personal property. just watch. but not Trump's. see anything wrong here?


i'll take a deep dive into this whole presidential records act later. you might find it interesting.
HDGristle's Avatar
You better not cite 44 U.S.C. §2203 (a) and (b) or Judicial Watch or I can guarantee I won't
berryberry's Avatar
Yeah the Senile Biden Docs scandal is nothing like Mar a Lago.

What’s harder to break into? An exclusive private club with private security, cameras, a strict access list, and secret service protection or an old Senile man’s garage?

Devo's Avatar
  • Devo
  • 01-13-2023, 03:28 PM
Like it or not Alheimers Joe is in deep shit.

Chinese bribes to Penn, for the think tank, a job for his son there, its all out there, and this opens the box to look into EVERYTHING.

For the next two years the Rs are going to beat the drum loudly and, have a few reports to release right before the next election.

This is going to be "Bidengate".
berryberry's Avatar
Like it or not Alheimers Joe is in deep shit.

Chinese bribes to Penn, for the think tank, a job for his son there, its all out there, and this opens the box to look into EVERYTHING.

For the next two years the Rs are going to beat the drum loudly and, have a few reports to release right before the next election.

This is going to be "Bidengate". Originally Posted by Devo
Indeed. And Senile Biden has already admitted guilt publicly over his handling of classified documents. The statement by the White House that Biden “inadvertently misplaced” the classified documents is an admission of guilt, because mishandling them is a violation of the law

The statute that is implicated by Biden’s conduct is the Espionage Act of 1917 — the same law under which former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was investigated, and which the Department of Justice is using to investigate Trump. Trump is the only one of the three who can argue that, as president, he had declassification authority with regard to the memorabilia and other documents he allegedly took to his private residence.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ilt-in-public/