The Democrats Election Fraud in Wisconsin in 2020 Exposed

Already answered - you should play closer attention

Gableman said that's not true, since the courts dismissed the election challenges citing the doctrine of laches, which means the allegations of wrongdoing were never addressed.

So first they had no standing to bring a case prior to the election and then when they did afterwards, it was dismissed on some BS doctrine of latches. No evidence was ever heard. The courts failed America Originally Posted by berryberry

Courts did not fail. tRump and his foolish nitwits could not produce any evidence to support their bullshit lies and claims. Because they were all lies and bullshit.

So first they had no standing to bring a case prior to the election and then when they did afterwards, it was dismissed on some BS doctrine of latches. No evidence was ever heard. The courts failed America Originally Posted by berryberry

Just because you keep repeating this doesn't make it true. Besides, trump was in charge of the DOJ when all this was going on. Why didn't they look further into it when it was fresh and timely?

That's right, because there was no evidence whatsoever of his claims. He's just a loser and a liar, with nothing of substance to back up anything about a "stolen election".

Courts did not fail. tRump and his foolish nitwits could not produce any evidence to support their bullshit lies and claims. Because they were all lies and bullshit. Originally Posted by rmg_35

Try some reading comprehension

The courts dismissed the election challenges without hearing evidence, which means the allegations of wrongdoing were never addressed.

First they dismissed them saying that they had no standing to bring a case prior to the election and then when they brought a case afterwards, it was dismissed on some BS doctrine of latches. No evidence was ever heard. The courts failed America

I guess repeating said false information one more time won't tip the scales in either direction, but it is false information.

trump has zero evidence. None. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

Another in a long line of facts identifying voter fraud in Wisconsin

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman testified that his investigation found that there were far more people registered to vote than were eligible; 4.5 million eligible voters, but over 7 million on the rolls.

Another in a long line of facts identifying voter fraud in Wisconsin

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman testified that his investigation found that there were far more people registered to vote than were eligible; 4.5 million eligible voters, but over 7 million on the rolls. Originally Posted by berryberry

... And, of course ILLLEGAL drop boxes were used.

The Supreme Court there also CONFIRMED that.

So much for - uh, WHAT is it?? ... Zip - zilch - nada
voter fraud.

... The lads who keep claiming that surely owe you
a good apology, Berry.

#### Salty

Lol. For being so wrong all the time, it's funny how some of you keep acting like you have the upper hand here.

I guess you can keep complaining about nonexistent voter fraud, if you wish. It won't change any of the facts, nor will it produce any evidence. But hey, have at it, lads.

... And, of course ILLLEGAL drop boxes were used.

The Supreme Court there also CONFIRMED that.

So much for - uh, WHAT is it?? ... Zip - zilch - nada
voter fraud.

... The lads who keep claiming that surely owe you
a good apology, Berry.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

They do owe me a good apology Salty. But we know the leftists will never apologize. They will continue to bury their heads in the sand and ignore the facts. They will continue to lie about what really occurred. So pathetic on their part

Lol. For being so wrong all the time, it's funny how some of you keep acting like you have the upper hand here.

I guess you can keep complaining about nonexistent voter fraud, if you wish. It won't change any of the facts, nor will it produce any evidence. But hey, have at it, lads. Originally Posted by tommy156

... We have "the upper hand" - THE TRUTH!

... See? ...Use of illegal drop boxes - Voter Fraud.

#### Salty

... We have "the upper hand" - THE TRUTH!

... See? ...Use of illegal drop boxes - Voter Fraud.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Alas Salty, leftists are allergic to the truth

LOL!!! Truth?? There have been nothing but lies about voter fraud coming from the trump "people" for almost 3 years now. No evidence, no smoking gun. Just conspiracy after conspiracy, with a generous amount of whining and tears.

Try some reading comprehension
Originally Posted by berryberry

Some people should take their own advise then they won't continually post the lies and bullshit that they do.

Alas Salty, leftists are allergic to the truth Originally Posted by berryberry

As I was saying . . .

They do owe me a good apology Salty. But we know the leftists will never apologize. They will continue to bury their heads in the sand and ignore the facts. They will continue to lie about what really occurred. So pathetic on their part Originally Posted by berryberry

Ok, were sorry you're wrong.

Regardless of how we get to the outcome of 'un-proven allegations'; we could say or add to the mix that the ppl filing the court cases were incompetent, or that they didn't understand that in order for a case to be heard, it has to have merit, proof, and do so within the period of laches; a legal period that would merit hearing the case, those who filed the cases fucked up.

I'm certain that you feel like your side was treated unfairly, but I'm also equally certain that feelings, are not part of a legal ruling.

And for that we are really, really , ....really sorry. Honestly super duper sorry.

Ok, were sorry you're wrong.

Regardless of how we get to the outcome of 'un-proven allegations'; we could say or add to the mix that the ppl filing the court cases were incompetent, or that they didn't understand that in order for a case to be heard, it has to have merit, proof, and do so within the period of laches; a legal period that would merit hearing the case, those who filed the cases fucked up.

I'm certain that you feel like your side was treated unfairly, but I'm also equally certain that feelings, are not part of a legal ruling.

And for that we are really, really , ....really sorry. Honestly super duper sorry. Originally Posted by eyecu2

Lol. Well played, Eye.

Gotta say it's pretty satisfying to see the "fuck your feelings" crowd have so many hurt feelings right now.