Fine review that reads like a Promoter review Originally Posted by Chung TranHmmmmm, can you elaborate on this? Among other things, promoter reviews have 100% positive comments and zero negative comments.......and if the promoters do have a comment about the girl that is even remotely negative, they immediately counter it with something positive (kind of like a job interview).
Hmmmmm, can you elaborate on this? Among other things, promoter reviews have 100% positive comments and zero negative comments.......and if the promoters do have a comment about the girl that is even remotely negative, they immediately counter it with something positive (kind of like a job interview).Don't bother trying to make it logical; your talking to the promoter/simp and studio owner handles on this thread.
Besides mentioning when she was leaving Dallas, I see absolutely nothing in this review that could be considered promoter-esque, but maybe you're just joking and giving him a hard time. Originally Posted by AspenCalifornia
Besides mentioning when she was leaving Dallas, I see absolutely nothing in this review that could be considered promoter-esque, but maybe you're just joking and giving him a hard time. Originally Posted by AspenCaliforniaCertainly some active hyperbole, designed to mimic the many posts I've read from those who see a Promoter behind every keyboard.
Certainly some active hyperbole, designed to mimic the many posts I've read from those who see a Promoter behind every keyboard. Originally Posted by Chung TranCan you please provide a specific example? When I read promoter reviews, I don't cherry pick one thing out of their reviews and then decide they're a promoter. There usually needs to be an aggregation of items in their review or their review / posting history. The fact that he mentioned multiple negative things about Bonney (e.g. mood was dampened bc she counted money in front of him, she had coffee breath, scripted session, etc.) automatically disqualifies it from being a promoter review.
Can you please provide a specific example? When I read promoter reviews, I don't cherry pick one thing out of their reviews and then decide they're a promoter. There usually needs to be an aggregation of items in their review or their review / posting history. The fact that he mentioned multiple negative things about Bonney (e.g. mood was dampened bc she counted money in front of him, she had coffee breath, scripted session, etc.) automatically disqualifies it from being a promoter review.AC, Just ignore him (CT)… CT calling others a promoter is as much of a hypocrite move, as it for Boycotters visiting Studios. With that being said SF shouldn’t be labeled a “promoter” bc of this review. This review is critical of the girl for minor issues in my eyes (bookkeeping/coffee breath,etc) shouldn’t be deal breakers in terms of recommendations, compared to the issues listed in SF review prior to this one at AS.
I think the intent of your original post was just meant to take a jab or two at the OP. But I think you are 100% incorrect that this review "reads like a promoter review." Originally Posted by AspenCalifornia
Army and Aspen, y'all are taking my comment way too seriously. I thought I explained myself clearly, but the words ''irony'' and ''hyperbole'' are words you need more familiarization with.I could care less about what AP and others post in terms of the “promoters” list… you meanwhile are an actual promoter who pumps the same studios and in the past has pumped the same studios reviews from depths of pages 8-9 just to help the studio you work for.
I'm lampooning the idea that 40 Guys (including both of you, who made the published list) are Promoters. You are so stuck on the thought that Promoters rule, that you couldn't comprehend. Originally Posted by Chung Tran
I could care less about what AP and others post in terms of the “promoters” list…You did care, in fact you begged AP to take you off of his list. Not only that, you were specifically named as a KFest Promoter. Not only that, you reviewed KFest twice (following up, bumping KFest threads) in Mid-October, whereas I last visited and last commented on any KFest thread in September.
The review speaks for itself, has nothing promotion in it or side to it. Move along to your KF bumps Originally Posted by Armydude89D
You did care, in fact you begged AP to take you off of his list. Not only that, you were specifically named as a KFest Promoter. Not only that, you reviewed KFest twice (following up, bumping KFest threads) in Mid-October, whereas I last visited and last commented on any KFest thread in September.Lies
These are knowable, traceable facts. Originally Posted by Chung Tran
Lies Originally Posted by Armydude89DFacts. You even put ''rent free in haters heads'', as a reaction to Guys calling you a Promoter. You started with veloztec, after he mentioned you as a major KFest Promoter.
Facts. You even put ''rent free in haters heads'', as a reaction to Guys calling you a Promoter. You started with veloztec, after he mentioned you as a major KFest Promoter.You have hijacked this thread man.. but in response to your claims..
You are hung up on the whole idea of promoters, hitting back at those who say you promote, while tossing out the same charge at guys who do not. You jumped in to ''defend'' Springfest against my joke remark, that I said was hyperbole, yet Springfest himself doesn't care. The fact that you do, is shining a light on yourself. Originally Posted by Chung Tran
Keep pumping KF, and it’s hilarious I’m a KF promoter when I aint been there and called out the msog tax they are trying to do Originally Posted by Armydude89DYou're running away from, and avoiding facts. You reviewed KFest twice in October, I haven't been there in more than 50 days, nor have I posted in any KFest review since then. You were labelled a KFest Promoter by veloztec (and a Promoter by AsianP), yet now you pretend it is other guys who are Promoters.