Clinton and Epstein

'Trust me, bro, I'm an expert' seems to be something that the MAGAs fall for time and time again.


'Trust me bro, the hurricane won't go this way because I drew another line with a sharpie!'


'Trust me bro, this Wuhan Flu isn't real! Fake news!'



'Trust me bro, if you inject clorox into your body, you'll be immune from covid!'


'Trust me bro, I didn't lose the election!'


'Trust me bro, I'm still the POTUS in exile!'


'Trust me bro, I didn't do any deplorable acts on my friend, Jeff, who's a great guy's playground island!'


It's wholly ironic that everyone is going 'CLINTON WENT TO THE ISLAND! CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON!!!!', meanwhile another ex POTUS is also there and trying to run for office again.


I'm not asking 'Why Clinton?'. If he did those deplorable acts, he should be punished for it. But another POTUS did the same thing, who is trying to run for office right now.. so, I'm asking 'Why JUST Clinton?

In this day and age of the me-to movement and females going after men for “inappropriate” acts from years and years ago, why haven’t any more of these “victims” come out like they have done prior??
IMHO, most of the people on the list (wherever this mystery list is) are 100% innocent. Again, clouding the issue so finding the guilty scum that are guilty becomes more difficult.
Personally, I wouldn’t be shocked if Bill was guilty, wouldn’t be the first time his dick got him in trouble.

I don't know the specifics, but I find it very likely that any of these female victims might not had been from America. If you are in a first world country, with a good social safety net, then you could go to authorities. If you didn't have a social safety net, you might be more susceptible to blackmail - which they obviously would had been doing.

'Trust me, bro, I'm an expert' seems to be something that the MAGAs fall for time and time again.


'Trust me bro, the hurricane won't go this way because I drew another line with a sharpie!'


'Trust me bro, this Wuhan Flu isn't real! Fake news!'



'Trust me bro, if you inject clorox into your body, you'll be immune from covid!'


'Trust me bro, I didn't lose the election!'


'Trust me bro, I'm still the POTUS in exile!'


'Trust me bro, I didn't do any deplorable acts on my friend, Jeff, who's a great guy's playground island!'


It's wholly ironic that everyone is going 'CLINTON WENT TO THE ISLAND! CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON!!!!', meanwhile another ex POTUS is also there and trying to run for office again.


I'm not asking 'Why Clinton?'. If he did those deplorable acts, he should be punished for it. But another POTUS did the same thing, who is trying to run for office right now.. so, I'm asking 'Why JUST Clinton? Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

... Now, now - please don't shit yer knickers, mate.
Lemme try to make sense of things... BIDEN was there??
Is he in the list of names?? ... Was he there more than Clinton?

OR did you mean Trump? ... We KNOW Trump is in the clear
as far as any wrongdoing... As Prosecutours in the
Epstein and Maxwell hearings there ASKED Trump for help.

That's how we know that Trump surely kicked Epstein
out of Mar-a-Lago - and the reason WHY.

... Let's see what other names come out - besides Clinton.

#### Salty

I’d still like to see Salty post a link supporting his claims.

I’d surely look at them, but that would-make onley one of us. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Bill said he was never there, that is all the proof we need.

Bill said he was never there, that is all the proof we need. Originally Posted by bigguyt

... Too right, mate.

WHO needs the likes of the NY Times, CNN, ABC-News,
Fox , and others ALL commenting on Bill Clinton
being "Doe-36"... ... ...

#### Salty

Here's one key difference between normal, well-adjusted people and the trump cult: if a politician we vote for is guilty of something, we're fine with them being punished for it.

I don't care if I voted for Clinton, if he was on Epstein Island for nefarious reasons? Lock him up! See how easy that was? We Democrats don't get all cultish and worshippy about our politicians.

... Too right, mate.

WHO needs the likes of the NY Times, CNN, ABC-News,
Fox , and others ALL commenting on Bill Clinton
being "Doe-36"... ... ...

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

News organizations you surely-always deny and discredit, as is the MAGA cult way. Are you willing to accept the credibility of those news outlets?

If you do, then there are a few thousand reports you need to read.

If not, then why make such a statement?

Here's one key difference between normal, well-adjusted people and the trump cult: if a politician we vote for is guilty of something, we're fine with them being punished for it.

I don't care if I voted for Clinton, if he was on Epstein Island for nefarious reasons? Lock him up! See how easy that was? We Democrats don't get all cultish and worshippy about our politicians. Originally Posted by tommy156

Agreed. There really isn't any other 'right' answer.


If Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Carter, or any other future still living President committed a crime by going to a kinky island playground, they should be locked up. Don't care who you are, you do a crime, you should do the time.


US Presidents and politicians, past, present, and future, are NOT above the law. Anyone who cares to disagrees with this statement is delusional and in a cult where they think the people they look up to are gods.



So once again, 'Why just Clinton?'

Who else are they going to trash? That's why Clinton.

News organizations you surely-always deny and discredit, as is the MAGA cult way. Are you willing to accept the credibility of those news outlets?

If you do, then there are a few thousand reports you need to read.

If not, then why make such a statement? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

... Once again, you mis-understand.

I surely mentioned all those news outlets for YOU
and the other lads... So you'd see that it wasn't
just Fox-News reporting on Clinton there.

#### Salty

Who else are they going to trash? That's why Clinton. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Bingo

Who else are they going to trash? That's why Clinton. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

... Juanita Broderick was trashing Clinton today.
And prolly got a good reason to do so.

... Don't know IF Juanita ever met Epstein.

### Salty

... Juanita Broderick was trashing Clinton today.
And prolly got a good reason to do so.

... Don't know IF Juanita ever met Epstein.

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

I believe you Saty you probably don't know anything about Jaunita Broderick. My guess you probably read a headline with her and Clinton's Name in it and had to post something.
here is something from "Wikipedia"

. In a sworn statement in 1997 with the placeholder name "Jane Doe #5",[3] Broaddrick filed an affidavit with Paula Jones's lawyers stating there were unfounded rumors and stories circulating "that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. ... These allegations are untrue".
She then recanted that statement to investigators of potential misconduct by Clinton led by Kenneth Starr, while insisting at the time that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way. Starr declined to further investigate.

... Your guess would be WRONG there, mate.

... Juanita was actually commenting YESTERDAY about Clinton.
Please try to keep up.

AND do you know-of what happened between Clinton and Paula Jones??
... The person LYING there was Bill Clinton. ... The Court said so.

#### Salty