So busy patting yourselves on the back, you forgot about this POS

Well you should have voted harder

President Trump

Say it with me

President Trump

Maybe Brooks should read the police report and eye witness statements. The chick is clearly lying. She wanted to fuck, he fucked her, and she needed something to tell her husband who was trying to find her all night. He was cleared for good reason.

Maybe Brooks should read the police report and eye witness statements. The chick is clearly lying. She wanted to fuck, he fucked her, and she needed something to tell her husband who was trying to find her all night. He was cleared for good reason. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

You would think the usual suspects here would realize that the police found no evidence of any assault. Thus no charges. But sadly, their TDS blinds them to reality.

Maybe Brooks should read the police report and eye witness statements. The chick is clearly lying. She wanted to fuck, he fucked her, and she needed something to tell her husband who was trying to find her all night. He was cleared for good reason. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

You would think the usual suspects here would realize that the police found no evidence of any assault. Thus no charges. But sadly, their TDS blinds them to reality. Originally Posted by Lantern2814

Unfortunately site rules keep me from talking about the details of the allegations involved. Let’s just say that the woman was not in a position where saying “no” kept the assault from happening.

Just because there was not enough proof of sexual assault for charges to be filed certainly doesn’t mean that the assault didn’t occur. The fact that there was a payoff is telling in my opinion.

Read more here: https://archive.ph/FhKK4

There’s a great opinion piece in the times today by David Brooks that IMHO explains much about this attitude. https://archive.ph/habOl. I recommend it highly.

Excerpts from the article.

The Moral Challenge of Trumpism

Trumpism represents an alternative value system. The people I regard as upright and admirable MAGA regards as morally disgraceful, and the people I regard as corrupt and selfish MAGA regards as heroic.

What does heroism look like according the MAGA morality? It looks like the sort of people whom Trump has picked to be in his cabinet. The virtuous man in this morality is self-assertive, combative, transgressive and vengeful. He’s not afraid to break the rules and come to his own conclusions. He has contempt for institutions and is happy to be a battering force to bring them down. He is unbothered by elite scorn but, in fact, revels in it and goes out of his way to generate it.

In this mind-set, if the establishment regards you as a sleazeball, you must be doing something right. If the legal system indicts you, you must be a virtuous man.

In this morality, the fact that a presidential nominee is accused of sexual assault is a feature, not a bug. It’s a sign that this nominee is a manly man. Manly men go after what they want. They assert themselves and smash propriety — including grabbing women “by the pussy” if they feel like it.

In this worldview, a nominee enshrouded in scandal is more trustworthy than a person who has lived an honest life. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

And yet - the American people have spoken - and they
want Trump back-on as President and making the decisions.

And those decisions include Pete Hegseth, Kash Patel,
and a number of GREATLY qualified WOMEN in the Cabinet.

#### Salty

So you link don't work unless sine up crap.
Basically he no body we never heard of

Unfortunately site rules keep me from talking about the details of the allegations involved. Let’s just say that the woman was not in a position where saying “no” kept the assault from happening. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Which is utter bullshit. Again, read the police report and eyewitness statements. She was just fine at almost 2am and again at almost 4am, according to witnesses testimony and video evidence. She stayed out all night to fuck a famous guy, with her husband and kids in the same hotel (classy broad), and needed an excuse.

What a stud. My man could get laid at a convent. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

That's after he puts something into the girl's drink.

If anything he's an expert at assault.

Except there’s video and eyewitness testimony that clearly shows that didn’t happen.

Well according to his own mother.

“On behalf of all the women (and I know it’s many) you have abused in some way, I say… get some help and take an honest look at yourself,”

“I have no respect for any man that belittles, lies, cheats, sleeps around and uses women for his own power and ego.”

“You are that man (and have been for years) and as your mother, it pains me and embarrasses me to say that, but it is the sad, sad truth.”

But some in this forum have this to say.

What a stud. My man could get laid at a convent. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

You guys are trippin if you think that dude assaulted anyone to get some pussy. He’s tall, handsome, rich, famous and jacked. Alpha as fuck. He can bang any woman he wants, including some 304 whose husband and kids are in the same hotel. Plenty of guy’s like that out there, a shit ton in the service. Y’all are just jealous you’re not one of them. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

This guy has kicked in doors and killed people. He doesn’t cow tow to anyone.

Women love him. He is everything that every little twerp sitting in his mothers’s basement playing war on his computer wishes he really was. Originally Posted by Jacky S

Someone’s not secure enough in their masculinity to recognize the guy who has women falling at his feet. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

But I think David Brooks has it right. In MAGA land things are opposite like in bizarro world.

In this morality, the fact that a presidential nominee is accused of sexual assault is a feature, not a bug. It’s a sign that this nominee is a manly man. Manly men go after what they want. They assert themselves and smash propriety — including grabbing women “by the pussy” if they feel like it.

In this worldview, a nominee enshrouded in scandal is more trustworthy than a person who has lived an honest life.

Pete Hegseth is morally corrupt and treats women poorly. He’s been accused as a rapist! But that’s OK because he’s a manly alpha man.

That might hold some weight if 99% of the accusations weren’t demonstrably false.

Except there’s video and eyewitness testimony that clearly shows that didn’t happen. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Just because the eyewitness did not see him put something into her drink does not mean that he didn't do it.

Don't you find it odd that he wrote an article saying if a woman is ("not all there") and you are intimate with her that's perfectly okay. :

The witness and videos aren’t about catching him doing something, they’re about her state of mind and faculties. They were fine at 2am and again at 4am. That’s a 2 hour window to add something, let it take effect, do the deed and recover completely. No fucking way. She’s 100% full of shit and the cops all knew it.

That might hold some weight if 99% of the accusations weren’t demonstrably false. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Because “Manly Men” and “Alpha Males” don’t have to act like douche bags or assault women. According to your own words they have women falling at their feet. But 99% of all women’s accusations are just made up?

It’s attitudes like this that allow men to act like assholes towards women.

The witness and videos aren’t about catching him doing something, they’re about her state of mind and faculties. They were fine at 2am and again at 4am. That’s a 2 hour window to add something, let it take effect, do the deed and recover completely. No fucking way. She’s 100% full of shit and the cops all knew it. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

And yet he still paid for her silence. Maybe because he knew he was guilty?

Of course he did, so would anyone in that position which I’m sure his lawyer made perfectly clear. Just look at this thread. Regardless of the facts of the case, an accusation is all it takes.