More news on dems conspiring to steal elections

Massive fraud

Trump provided no evidence, yet kept saying it for 4 years non stop.

None of the 60 cases provided even enough evidence for judges to merit a trial. Many of the lawyers were cited and fined for bringing frivolous lawsuits.

There is no investigation to come. Investigate that frivolous lawsuits were not frivolous ?

Beers being spilled everywhere over that assertion.

WHY do you keep posting this stuff without citing where it comes from??!!

Tell us your source.

(BTW, this case is old as fuck, and it's about a local election. No one would waste their time on it if it wasn't for your "click bait" Subject line) Originally Posted by BobbyBeeBrown

To answer the question as to Link and age of Case

• Federal Charges were filed in this case pertaining to a 2021 Mayoral Election
• News Articles were dated Feb 21, 2025
  • https://www.nationalreview.com/news/...teal-election/
  • https://apnews.com/article/mail-ball...cf848867d1ea3f
  • https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...rb/ar-AA1zxLje

Quick goggle search provided the above information, links.

Members wishing to discuss the Original Topic are welcome to do so.

Member wishing to exchange insults, taunting and thread hijacks should reevaluate their posting style.

A couple of points to ponder . . .

• #6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.
• #13 - Our moderating staff monitors the forums with the goal of keeping threads on track and on topic. Occasionally we may issue specific instructions or direction to a poster and we ask that you respect those instructions and follow them. Disregarding a moderator's written instruction or repeating a violation for which you have been warned will most certainly result in penalty.

So you do admit that the claim has of 60 cases is spurious at best or an outright lie by political hacks.

The 60 cases were originated by Trump.


No one else.


There are many lists enumerating them.

Deflect much? The question was "how many had a real hearing?"

Wtf does this have to do a podunk local election they cheated in and still came up 27 votes short?

The compounding interest on those losses will hurt for decades to come... assuming anyone gives a fuck about it save for the novelty of how dumb it was.

Deflect much? The question was "how many had a real hearing?" Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

So 60 judges decided to get together and gang up on Trump's lawyers, who presented lawsuits that had no evidence or merit ?



It didn't happen. At this point, believe what you want. No purpose to discuss further.

To Return to the Original Topic.

The Topic was clarified by Staff.

Points to ponder . . .

• #6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.
• #13 - Our moderating staff monitors the forums with the goal of keeping threads on track and on topic. Occasionally we may issue specific instructions or direction to a poster and we ask that you respect those instructions and follow them. Disregarding a moderator's written instruction or repeating a violation for which you have been warned will most certainly result in penalty.