Encounter: Got taken

Feel free to remove if this pic is in violation of one of the many rules I can't keep up with.

I got a PM from Dr EPG saying me my report was inaccurate. I was there I know what went down this provider is nothing but trouble. I only posted this to help others avoid my dilemma what seems like the only info wanted on this site is hardcore details. I post to inform not to gain premium access.

"Inaccurate?" That was the term used? I can see this being rejected as a Review since there was no physical contact. It more-so belongs in Coed or Men's Lounge. But rejected for accuracy doesn't compute unless she's a well established provider with a stellar reputation who successfully pleaded her case back channel, which seems doubtful.


.

I got a PM from Dr EPG saying me my report was inaccurate. I was there I know what went down this provider is nothing but trouble. I only posted this to help others avoid my dilemma what seems like the only info wanted on this site is hardcore details. I post to inform not to gain premium access. Originally Posted by pat911

Sir that is not what was said and definitely not why the encounter was reject

As per ECCIE guidelines there was an inquiry made pertaining to the encounter don’t try to make it more than what it was.

If you feel you want to discuss this in more detail you can always send me a Pm

#23 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.

Lol she makes a specific reference you in the ad tigerfan just linked. At least she gives credit where it's due.
I can't comment on the veracity of her claims but if she truly felt unsafe I find it curious that didn't happen until after gifts were purchased or given

The same countertop place around 11:00 a.m. in broad daylight we must have stopped at a half dozen or so red lights if she was uncomfortable like she said she could have exited at any time. Is she just play the game like she said.

Can you Pm me her seeking name please?