Sure babe Originally Posted by Heehaw69I thought you might be from Wexford because I new someone out there who had the nickname “DickFace” because like you he always says stupid things, and he would be the kind of guy to call himself Heehaw cause he too was a bit of a simpleton, if it’s you I hope all is well, if not maybe it’s a relative, take care.
I thought you might be from Wexford because I new someone out there who had the nickname “DickFace” because like you he always says stupid things, and he would be the kind of guy to call himself Heehaw cause he too was a bit of a simpleton, if it’s you I hope all is well, if not maybe it’s a relative, take care. Originally Posted by Alltrent57#1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.
#1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences. Originally Posted by Dr-epgI’m curious why when a member post a review and other members rudely criticize the person who posted the review it’s not considered a infraction, but when the member who posted the review responds to the attack it’s considered an infraction. If being fair the members who attack a reviewer should be the ones warned.
I’m curious why when a member post a review and other members rudely criticize the person who posted the review it’s not considered a infraction, but when the member who posted the review responds to the attack it’s considered an infraction. If being fair the members who attack a reviewer should be the ones warned. Originally Posted by Alltrent57Noone knows who gets warned or gets points. For all u know they did get warned or points
Noone knows who gets warned or gets points. For all u know they did get warned or pointsThank you, I have been visiting these boards all the way back to when there was ASPD, so I know there are always going to be a few wise guys who complain about everything, I should just ignore them but ignorance is hard to ignore sometimes!
There is a rule against posting a reply that a review is not real, I thinks it's called quaking.
So again u don't know who got warned Originally Posted by oldman2525