OK, Laz or COG, if it's so easy, answer the questions:Why are you hung up on the belief that I believe assaulting a 16 year old girl in that manner is acceptable. I cannot think of a scenario where I would resort to that kind of action. I have two sons and never used a belt on them like that. I don't recall using a belt on them for any reason. His using the excuse of losing his temper is unacceptable. A parent should never punish in anger.
Is it OK to beat a 16 year old with a belt? If he'd just have beat her a little less, of been less foul mouthed when it did it, it would be OK? Or hit her a little less hard?
So how many licks with a belt is OK. 1? 5? 10? How do you draw the line? Does it make a difference what she did? Does it matter what he says? How far can he draw back when he gives her the number of licks you say is OK? How hard can they be? Does that make a difference? How to we measure the hardness? Does it have to break the skin? Or is a bruise enough? And what if she bruises easily? Originally Posted by TexTushHog
So any beating with a belt should be prohibited? By the State? Criminal conduct, or just take their kid away? Originally Posted by TexTushHogWell I personally think that it should be. I believe that you only teach your child violence, and the wrong way to handle things. It clearly sends the wrong message not to mention what it does to a childs emotional stability in the long run. Our mothers and fathers and their mothers and fathers may have resorted to this years ago, but that still doesn't make it right. Time for people to stop living in the back woods dark ages thinking it is ok. I most certainly think it is even more heinous what this Judge did since his daughter has Atex Cerebral Palsy. Parents need to take parenting classes in this country. If your gonna have children then they ought to demand that some minimal amount of training for child rearing be involved imho. We are after all shaping the lives of those who will become adults in this country and some day some of them may be running it.
Well I personally think that it should be. I believe that you only teach your child violence, and the wrong way to handle things. It clearly sends the wrong message not to mention what it does to a childs emotional stability in the long run. Originally Posted by ;1811777
Granny Pleasures said:LOL Marshall, you must be a youngin in your 20's to think 47 is a grand old age. However, not a granny yet.. hope to be one day soon. I have successfully raised 2 children one in college getting a masters in Geology and a son who is in Naval Intelligence. So I think my opinions on child rearing kinda trump yours..lol
Well, apparently bad parenting creates bad people. This girl posts the video 7 years after the fact because daddy took her BMW and allowance away. It was payback on dad, who held a respected position in the community. 7 years after the fact....water under the bridge....let it go and move on.....scummy dad, scummy daughter...... Originally Posted by Marshall
Mom of the year.
Btw...I like your showcase. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
Granny Pleasures said:"Hillary Adams said she waited so long to expose her father because she was terrified at what might have happened had she done so while still living under his roof. She said the outpouring of support and encouragement she's received since posting the clip is tempered by the sadness that it's her father repeatedly lashing her with a belt and threatening to beat her "into submission."
Well, apparently bad parenting creates bad people. This girl posts the video 7 years after the fact because daddy took her BMW and allowance away. It was payback on dad, who held a respected position in the community. 7 years after the fact....water under the bridge....let it go and move on.....scummy dad, scummy daughter...... Originally Posted by Marshall