Is anybody else curious what age

I understand! Originally Posted by Still Looking

Hey I like that photo! (Of cougar, hasn't posted.) Mind if I use it?

IDT I've been with anyone under 21 even in civvie life when I was a teenager. I was a late bloomer and didn't get laid until about age 21.

In the hobby, I've seen ages 20's, 30's, 40's and 50's. I have found the 30-50's age groups to be the best match, especially late 30's to late 40's. So, I would say I lean more towards the "mature" lady. At my age, there is more we can discuss, and I don't have to feel like I have to bang her incessantly to give her a good time. We have nice, relaxed sessions.

Hey I like that photo! (Of cougar, hasn't posted.) Mind if I use it? Originally Posted by Leah Ireland

ABSOLUTLEY NO PROBLEM!

My favorite encounter would be to find someone in early 20's (and I'm a LOT older)--if she's nice, patient and understanding, where it can feel romantic. Women who are smart and conversational are nice, but I don't feel the need to seek someone my age who would be most compatible in intelligence, experience, values and interests, because I have plenty of that in my real life, anyway. In most cases, my sexual interest in a woman would lessen as she gets past 35, unless she is remarkably attractive and looks that age or younger.

I won't give specifics but I didn't pick my handle because I'm young.

Most the ladies I have really gotten along with well--and go back to see often--are in their late 30s-mid 40s. My ATF is now 48.

The other ladies I really enjoy are those whose minds are about 40 y/o but their bodies just haven't caught up yet.

Most of my clients are 40-60 range. Ive seen all ages, I find older want longer sessions and the younger want shorter sessions.



Im my civi life I like 29-35. I find myself more sexually compatible and attracted in that age range. Im 38. I dont seek them, just happens that way. lol

Most of my clients are 40-60 range. Ive seen all ages, I find older want longer sessions and the younger want shorter sessions.
Im my civi life I like 29-35. I find myself more sexually compatible and attracted in that age range. Im 38. I dont seek them, just happens that way. lol Originally Posted by LynnT

Let me write that down.... OLDER: Longer YOUNGER: Shorter! Got It!
I've been right all alone! LOL

I like them over 40.

I'm in my mid 40s and prefer girls from 18-24. I just have a thing for college age gals. Having said that, I'll see providers up to my own age range.

Just sayin': I've always wondered why the reviewer's age is not listed in the review. I think it would help with the pov.

I'm in my late 40's and I prefer ladies 40 and older

Just sayin': I've always wondered why the reviewer's age is not listed in the review. I think it would help with the pov. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

Can we have an age box for the fellows Chica?

That was what i was getting at ! If we had an age on the client it wouldnt hurt anything and it would give the client and provider better perspective when chatting or setting up a session and when it comes to reviews it would be nice to see the age just to see how someone clicks with a older or younger provider.
It might help us decide who to see and why one particular provider is better with younger or an older age group.
Just thinking out loud ...lol

Everyone voice their oppinion..it might not be smart to post age...i dont know.

In my hobby life, my favorite men to see are the ones in their 40's. We seem to 'click' the most. The age of men who visit me range from 40-70 so it varies quite a bit. My worst experience as a provider was with a mid 20's guy. He seemed very inexperienced & I think he just didn't know what to do.

I quit dating in my civilian life because it was a waste of time. Lol.

I am a lot closer to 65 than 64, so I prefer a more mature Lady, 39 happens to be the perfect age at this time.