Listing services on website

Irish Cream's Avatar
Odds are if it's not in her reviews, she proably does NOT do it...at least not me. What's in my reviews is ALL I do period. I don't do fetish or BDSM, so after 150 reviews if a guy can't figure out all I offer is massage, gfe, and pse, sorry. I don't discusss that crap until after he has been screened, and by then it's a bit too late if I "don't" do something lol. Originally Posted by London Rayne
I guess I find it hard to believe that 100% of a provider's clients would request 100% of the services she offers (or would offer) but, no problem nonetheless..
Google Washington DC Madam - the one who committed suicide rather than do time. The evidence presented by the DA in court included ads & website. (That was 3? 4? years ago?)

Google AZ escort agency - it's something @ dawn or sun or sky (forget). Ads, website and reviews were used by the state. This case is currently making it's way through appeals.

It's well known that you get arrested in vegas for "just showing up". One lady I spoke with went to an outcall, got off the elevator, there was a guy dressed in a delivery service type outfit with balloons and a box of cookies, he asked if she wanted a cookie, she took one and he arrested her - she never made it to the hotel room door - she just showed up.

Add the recent round of busts against regional boards - AZ (again), Detroit ...and the trend is obvious.

Why some think LE is stupid or oblivious....well I dont get it. Wherever "we" go, "they" will follow. In most states an ad is enough to prove "intent". If your ad or site is a blatant fks & sux for bux - you will blatantly be charged. Your ad, site & reviews are admissible. If your stuff is not blatant - you have at least given your attorney room to argue reasonable doubt in trail or wiggle room for the DA to accept lesser charges.

If you choose to list services and or services and rates on your site or in your ads, post naked pics, face pics: Yes you will make more. That's good. Gotta make that bail money.

I try and be as publicly vanilla as possible. Sure my services aren't spelled out, I have (I dunno) less than 15 reviews net wide in three & a half years (or thereabouts) and all my public pics are PG13. No, I dont answer questions at all ever - before during or after screening. I don't text. I only started posting my phone this August.

And I don't have a string of charges trailing behind me either. I've never been hassled, stalked, shorted, robbed, run out of a hotel..none of that bad stuff. That's my payoff.

Girls who are more blatant often do have that trail. If you're willing to accept that: rock on. Your business.

The times they are a changing with boards, reviews, website - everything 'net. Either get ahead of the curve or stay behind the eight ball.
Cpalmson's Avatar
I think it is a provider's decision on whether or not to list services offered. Now, if she does decide to list her services, then the list should include all activities she is willing to do. This whole GFE, A-Level Escort, etc is a non-descriptive pile of horse pooh. As a hobbyist, I prefer if a gal lists her services or links to P411. I read reviews, but most reviews are YMMV. If gal is well reviewed like London, then you know what you are getting (a damn good time ) On the other hand, some girls have no reviews, old reviews, or reviews all over the place. I just think that if you are going to list services, then be forthcoming with what is on the menu.
Chica Chaser's Avatar
Google AZ escort agency - it's something @ dawn or sun or sky (forget). Ads, website and reviews were used by the state. This case is currently making it's way through appeals. Originally Posted by babee
Desert Divas
London Rayne's Avatar
I guess I find it hard to believe that 100% of a provider's clients would request 100% of the services she offers (or would offer) but, no problem nonetheless.. Originally Posted by Irish Cream

That could be very true, but other than fetish and bdsm most providers who have over a hundred reviews get the point across in what they offer. I did have a guy ask me about a smoking fetish once, and that is not in my reviews..then again, THAT is not illegal.

Babee said the rest. Read between the lines or get screened, and ask in a way that's PG rated. You don't have to all out spell it out to most of us to get your point across. If you email asking, "Hey girl, you offer some BBFS?" Expect to go into spam.
Thank you very much for all this information. It answers what I was thinking was most likely true.




Google Washington DC Madam - the one who committed suicide rather than do time. The evidence presented by the DA in court included ads & website. (That was 3? 4? years ago?)

Google AZ escort agency - it's something @ dawn or sun or sky (forget). Ads, website and reviews were used by the state. This case is currently making it's way through appeals.

It's well known that you get arrested in vegas for "just showing up". One lady I spoke with went to an outcall, got off the elevator, there was a guy dressed in a delivery service type outfit with balloons and a box of cookies, he asked if she wanted a cookie, she took one and he arrested her - she never made it to the hotel room door - she just showed up.

Add the recent round of busts against regional boards - AZ (again), Detroit ...and the trend is obvious.

Why some think LE is stupid or oblivious....well I dont get it. Wherever "we" go, "they" will follow. In most states an ad is enough to prove "intent". If your ad or site is a blatant fks & sux for bux - you will blatantly be charged. Your ad, site & reviews are admissible. If your stuff is not blatant - you have at least given your attorney room to argue reasonable doubt in trail or wiggle room for the DA to accept lesser charges.

If you choose to list services and or services and rates on your site or in your ads, post naked pics, face pics: Yes you will make more. That's good. Gotta make that bail money.

I try and be as publicly vanilla as possible. Sure my services aren't spelled out, I have (I dunno) less than 15 reviews net wide in three & a half years (or thereabouts) and all my public pics are PG13. No, I dont answer questions at all ever - before during or after screening. I don't text. I only started posting my phone this August.

And I don't have a string of charges trailing behind me either. I've never been hassled, stalked, shorted, robbed, run out of a hotel..none of that bad stuff. That's my payoff.

Girls who are more blatant often do have that trail. If you're willing to accept that: rock on. Your business.

The times they are a changing with boards, reviews, website - everything 'net. Either get ahead of the curve or stay behind the eight ball. Originally Posted by babee