Disclaimer: Again, not aimed at anyone in particular. Just a general statement.
What I find rather amusing about this subject is how 2 months ago, after an attempted 'outing' of a San Antonio lady, nobody gave a shit. Where was this 'sisterhood' then?......Ooooooh that's right, she isn't well liked. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ac3e/6ac3e463ed57b5ab77710dc765a2e05bb4d24224" alt="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)"
But now, all of a sudden, we need to raise awareness on this issue? What's next, have some flyers printed, a telethon?
Well, I gave at the office and my yearly allotment of "give a shit" ran out a few days ago..... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ed5e/6ed5e8dba783bedfa470d52b67a90ffd0682b178" alt="Cool"
Disclaimer: Again, not aimed at anyone in particular. Just a general statement.
Originally Posted by BigBudha
Budha! Can I rub your belly again?????? Very GOOD...actually...EXCELLENT POINT!
I totally agree with you on this particular thing!
It is true that another most highly credible lady with NOT ONE, (NOT ONE PEOPLE!) bad review or otherwise alert, etc was, in fact, outed and personal information was disclosed. I think this new thread, though, is a great asset to prove and show how providers "should" stick together on such a topic whether they like one another or not. Peoples personal tastes, likes, dislikes, should NOT have a bearing on whether one deserves to be outed or not because IMO, NO ONE not provider nor hobbyist deserves this unless they are a danger to others.
It is NOT fair that while one person gets treated with discretion, fairness and dignity- another is thrown out with no regard whatsoever even though they were just fighting for their rights as far as disrection and safety go. I believe it is a providers and a hobbyists right as far as both of these go and when a person steps over that boundary- they should and need to be held accountable and the action needs to be fixed immediately to protect that person that was violated. I think much of the responsiblity of this intricate part lies within a board that needs members in order to prosper and so the members should be able to trust in some type of measure that will ensure their privacy. Here providers are NOT allowed to post identifying info on even a stalker- so why is it that providers cannot get the same respect...??????? That is MY question. It goes BOTH ways if you ask me.
DID not mean to hijack the thread, if I did. I am still a firm believer that no one deserves to have personal information disclosed- period. I do beleive that handles, numbers, etc, should be disclosed only IF a danger is posed of some sort.
Kelli Ann Preston