Planned Parenthood's Racist Roots

If you've got something other than weird analogies about little boys peeing in pools, or your inept attempts to try to belittle me by calling me "little timmie", I'm happy to respond. However, I'm not going to be a part of your typical, silly, school-boy neener-neener back and forth that you always throw out, because you're apparently intellectually incapable of responding in a meaningful way.

Carry on. Originally Posted by timpage

Are you still sputtering? Yet you do not deny and cannot repudiate the accounting fraud at PP. Keep sputtering Little Timmie; you are already brain dead. So your great leap into the great beyond will be but a small step for you.

The worst is some actually believe in late term and partial birth abortions....and guys like Obama have supported infanticide legislation (or opposed legislation that sought to outlaw infanticide).

But your post on PP-abortion-black demographics should be a wake up call to the community. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Yes, guys like Obama, and a lot of other guys, seem to think that a woman should have the right to choose the timing of her pregnancy and whether or not she is in a position to be able to raise and care for an infant. Imagine that....versus letting old white guys like you decide.

If you got a provider pregnant Whirly, what would you do? Encourage her to have the child and support him/her financially? Schedule visitation during the baby's upbringing and childhood? Run away and tell the provider it was her problem to deal with for the next 18 to 25 years? Or support her choice to have an abortion, if that's what she felt was best for her?

Eh? Step up big boy.

Yes, guys like Obama, and a lot of other guys, seem to think that a woman should have the right to choose the timing of her pregnancy and whether or not she is in a position to be able to raise and care for an infant. Imagine that....versus letting old white guys like you decide.

If you got a provider pregnant Whirly, what would you do? Encourage her to have the child and support him/her financially? Schedule visitation during the baby's upbringing and childhood? Run away and tell the provider it was her problem to deal with for the next 18 to 25 years? Or support her choice to have an abortion, if that's what she felt was best for her?

Eh? Step up big boy. Originally Posted by timpage

Hell, Obama has even demonstrated he is liberal enough support infanticide.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obama-and-infanticide/

Hell, Obama has even demonstrated he is liberal enough support infanticide.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obama-and-infanticide/ Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're a master of the obvious. I don't think there is much dispute that Obama is pro-choice.

You're a master of the obvious. I don't think there is much dispute that Obama is pro-choice. Originally Posted by timpage

Whatever, Little Timmie. 'Infanticide' - pro-choice . . . it's all the same to your brain-dead ilk.

Little Timmy; infanticide is the killing of the baby after delivery !

I know only a few men who would condone that...and their names are in the ash piles of history.

poor IB.

+1

.Dumb
...↓

poor IB. Originally Posted by CJ7

Dumber
...↓

+1 Originally Posted by Little Stevie

Some people just don't understand legal precedence. This is not, nor has it ever been, about the poor. This post started because COG wrote something that was the truth. You can read Sanger's own words in her book "The Pivot of Civilization" (available on Amazon). That book and her "Negro Project" lays out the goals of progressive abortion providers. To rid society of undesireable elements. Back when it started that meant not just "negros" but the Irish (catholics), the mentally incompetent, and the morally bankrupt (which probably applies to anyone on this site). Today it just means black. She clearly laid out the plan to put abortion clinics in poor neighborhoods and to co-opt the (black) clergy into supporting abortion rights. You can scream, you can pout, you can hold your breath, or you can make stupid remarks (that only serve to embarass yourselves) but Sanger's words reveal everything.

They seem to be succeeding; 33% of abortions are of black children which make up 16% of the population.


Fact check: Obama did try to stop a bill that would have protected the lives of children that survive an abortion. Obama does support infanticide. http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obama-and-infanticide/

I only said the article was interesting. It is interesting. For those capable of thought, it is even thought provoking. Too bad that leaves out so many of you.

I truly believe that the reason the right is against abortion is so the left will be for it. From the earliest foundlings of Planned Parenthood the goal of eugenics is being reached. The vast majority of those aborted are future liberals and Democrats. The more that are aborted the less those that are pulling the wagon will have to do as they are destined to ride in the wagon like they are taught from birth. Now if we could just come up with a way to make it more desirable to abort the future democrats it will surly be less costly to those that actually pay taxes. Maybe reduce the amount of welfare benefits if they dont abort.We are always told by the left that the population is growing at faster rate than can be supported which means they are concerned about not enough tax money to be redistributed in large enough amounts so they can ride the wagon. Those liberal elites at the top that are so rich they are afraid that if the population grows to a point that they finally come after them they will gladly want the government to pay to keep the population and the resultant potential revolutionaries in check.Take a look over history and see which leaders practiced the most genocide, Stalin, Hitler, Pol-pot, Mao, all either socialists or communists.

When they finally discover the "gay" gene and parents can abort their "gay" children the GLT people will suddenly become pro-life.


As for Timpage and his provider analogy; two people enter into a contract. both know their responsibilities. It is assumed that the provider has taken care of protection but the hobbyist could ask to be on the safe side. In any event the provider lied about conditions. In a court room this contract would be null and void because of the dishonesty of the one party. Any negative consequences would be faced by the one dishonest party. Of course that is contract law and not paternity law.
You never know though, perhaps your hobbyist has not children and thought never to have children. Maybe he is happy that something happened by chance. NOW, does the hobbyist, 1/2 of this equation, have a dog in the hunt if the provider wants to have an abortion?

Communists are just socialists in a hurry. Socialism takes place over years but communists are willing to slaughter millions to get to the promised land in a hurry.

I think abortions are wrong period
I think if you
don"t want your child put
them up for adoption there are too
many women wishing they had a baby
I had no money tralier trash baby father and a mother telling me I should maybe get it because of m3 baby father feloeies and crap that didnt stop me I really feel if a woman can kill a egg or baby or her own is a very self fish or heartless person idk I love my eggs everyone of them lol

I only said the article was interesting. It is interesting. For those capable of thought, it is even thought provoking. Too bad that leaves out so many of you. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

right whenever I B worthless gets his nose into the thread it turns into name calling drivel .