I've noticed that Bertrichard2000 has been getting some heat from a couple of the guys about his review. I know this man, I met him when I first started in the hobby, so he is a legit hobbyist.I have no problem with BR; I did find it amusing that he wanted to play WK with that girl from Beaumont when I pointed out that giving a full name and DL number seems to be quite a bit of upfront information.
Just thought I would be a WK for a change!Originally Posted by Nicolet
Each to his own though.
BR will never be mistaken for Shakespeare, but that is not a problem. Reviews should be equal opportunity--some guys cannot write as well as others.
The review DID indeed read like an ad, though. I can see where some would take issue with that, though continually throwing a fit and bashing really solves nothing. I have not seen the thread in question berating him--if there even IS a thread in question.
As long as we're on the subject of reviews, all I really look for is a list of services to determine if the provider is gfe. I don't need a long play-by-play though it is appreciated when it comes from the eloquent writers.
(What we are getting into lately is a lot of dawgs review themselves instead of the lady: "Man, my cock was so big she didn't think she could take it!" or ... "I made her cum five times in a row!" Yeah, right.)
BRichard's "review' though, did not even provide an accurate account of services.
He probably brought a bit of the scorn on his own head by his breezy attitude: "That's all you're going to get!"
No, it should not be an act of congress and people should move on.
But BR's missive was not my idea of an acceptable review.
PS: Okay, I see now the response was in the review itself. I didn't read down far enough. And I don't have a dog in the fight because the review was of the aforementioned party whom I will not be seeing anyway.
The mod handled it just right, nobody went overboard and again, with BR taking some unwarranted shots at people, any flack he caught was justified.