Incall arrangements

I work from my home. It doesn't mean we are careless of our personal safety. We also spend a GREAT deal of time verifying and researching our clients to ensure that they are safe and well mannered. Plus..this is Texas...do you honestly think that we don't have weapons?

As I said at the very beginning of my op, it wasn't _my_ security I was concerned about. I felt perfectly safe the entire time. The point of the post was the try to understand what one might feel obliged to do on noticing that someone else's security was apparently at risk.

I was previously under the impression that ladies who ply this trade tend to be quite careful. Reading what people have posted, I am gathering that provider carelessness about their own personal security is not terribly unusual, and that making my point and then minding my own business is probably the limit of my obligations.

Chalk it all up to naivety, I suppose.

I will say that this informs my opinions about legality of such activity, but I suppose that's been discussed ad nauseam elsewhere already. Originally Posted by ferretbeast

this is Texas...do you honestly think that we don't have weapons? Originally Posted by Malaya

Haha, honestly it hadn't occurred to me. I suppose it should have. I'm rather shy around weapons my own self.

thank you Malaya

I have a safe incall and I do not take many calls because I do not want any attention to be on me and then have neighbors report suspicious activity as well. I have concern for myself and my customers too.. but everyone is different some dont care about their safety and end up getting caught by LE and see to dozens of people it aient worth it for me. Hotels and Motels are pretty risky espically for providers who take many calls "Playing with Fire"... It is always important to consider the safety of yourself and others.

I keep a separate apartment for my play friends simply because I choose to keep those worlds separate. But yes many providers work out of their home. If you mentioned it to her and she didn't seem concerned I wouldn't press the issue. She may get concerned if you get that involved in her personal life. As long as a provider is screening well with no exceptions then it's ok. But their is and always will be risks in working from your home. IMHO

ferretbeast, I realize you have her best interest at heart, but if you want to keep seeing that provider...I wouldn't push the issue any further. The last thing a provider wants to hear...during the session...is how you think she's in danger or that she may have a security breach.

When you think about it...that's a bit of a *turn-off* and about one of the fastest ways to get put on her DNS list. (lol)

The last thing a provider wants to hear...during the session...is how you think she's in danger or that she may have a security breach. Originally Posted by Likinikki

Or how he thinks he knows better how to run her business and her security.

If you really think about we are all in risk whether it is at a motel, hotel, car, home ect.. no one is really safe unless you make it safe. Imangine how many hotels have LE watching out or planning stings but this business is a "risk".... no matter where you play..

chuck 12, said it best.... I too am a bit confused...lol...

I'm so Confused what exactly the point of this is?????????

The Hell Bunny has it locked.
In Texas we have the Castle Law. You can shoot a person in your own home for almost any reason. You cannot, however, carry a pistol to a motel and shoot someone there.
The secret is, when asked by the police, say "I was in fear for my life." It's a get out of jail free card in Texas. If you have a concealed carry that may work somewhere else but it always works at your home because you may go armed at home any time you choose.

Or how he thinks he knows better how to run her business and her security. Originally Posted by Chuck12

No.

I think it up to each individual provider to decided what and where is best for her and I prefer doing InCalls Only at my secluded location out near Wimberley just north of San Antonio about 50 minutes.

Now if any Client feels uneasy seeing me here and tells me such, then I try to ease their fears by telling them my purpose in doing so, but if they still are too nervous to give my InCall a try, then they should consider someone else to call and I will not be upset about it at all.

xoxoxoxo,

Rosiedaie
512-557-4045 bookings via the Phone Only !

http://www.geishaaffair.com/profile/...3598/Rosiedaie

www.rosiedaie.escort-site.com

www.preferred411.com/austin/rosiedaie

Gosh how I love Texas! Gotta love the Castle Law!

The Hell Bunny has it locked.
In Texas we have the Castle Law. You can shoot a person in your own home for almost any reason. You cannot, however, carry a pistol to a motel and shoot someone there.
The secret is, when asked by the police, say "I was in fear for my life." It's a get out of jail free card in Texas. If you have a concealed carry that may work somewhere else but it always works at your home because you may go armed at home any time you choose. Originally Posted by shooter1a

The Hell Bunny has it locked.
In Texas we have the Castle Law. You can shoot a person in your own home for almost any reason. You cannot, however, carry a pistol to a motel and shoot someone there.
The secret is, when asked by the police, say "I was in fear for my life." It's a get out of jail free card in Texas. If you have a concealed carry that may work somewhere else but it always works at your home because you may go armed at home any time you choose.

Shooter1a, you are wrong! Read the castle doctrine which is codified at Texas Penal Code 9.31. Specifically, 9.31(a)(3) states that deadly force is justified in cases in which the shooter 1. Has a reasonable fear for their life 2. and is not engaged in criminal activity at the time of the shooting, with the exception of a Class C misdemeanor or traffic violation (i.e. speeding). If a John is at the lady's house, they're doing more than talking. If and when she lies about why he was there, then it will just open a whole can of worms.

Investigators will subpoena computer records, cell phone/Text message logs, maybe even look to this site if they find it on one of their computers. If and when it is shown that he was hitting her up for some sex-for-hire, a Class B misdemeanor in Texas, you have a problem! It's not to say it can't be used, but engaging in criminal activity defeats/eliminates the presumption of justification for the shooter.

Also, if you're a convicted felon in Texas (that can come from multiple prostitution arrests, drugs, violence, etc.) you are precluded from owning any firearm and the "Castle Doctrine" is a moot point. In Krajcovic v. State, the assailant was initially held to be unjustified in the use of deadly force when a drug buyer robbed him. Why? Because Krajcovic was a thug, doing thug shit, and the law doesn't protect you!

Now, he was granted a new trial (there was an error in jury instructions and some evidence was improperly obtained) so he may get off the second time around, but considering he got 55 years for the first killing, it goes to show that you are NOT automatically protected.