Safety for hobbyists.

NOTE the poster is taking to somebody else not the thread!

Finally you are beginning to see the light!

When you address a person it is customary to use the word 'you' if known to you. If not use the word 'Sir'. Using the word 'he' or 'him' to refer to me is rude, and makes your contribution ad hominem and so off topic.

Now you say that I do not know the risks to a provider?

That is not the topic.

Maybe you should try to use your brain instead of your elbow and start your own topic on provider safety?
Originally Posted by sanan

Just so you understand I was talking to the others that are reading and responding to your thread. It was clear to me that they were misreading your post and I wanted to get them to reread it. Thanks for letting everyone know I was correct.

As for what you stated in your post, I agree with what Mokoa just posted.

As for the other silly attacks above, I will consider the source.

Champagne, Shhh!

For incalls to your location in addition to screening on the net, you may want to consider insisting on IDs and background checks/health etc.

I have raised my level of qualification way high because of the company I now get and their standards!

Not saying you need go that far, but for your own safety some of these precautions are well worth the effort in screening out providers who are fronts for criminal gangs.

Be safe :0) Originally Posted by sanan

So how can you insist on this from providers and not understand why they would like the same consideration? After all, you could be something very different than what you say since you have no verifications? You just don't make much sense.

You are asserting that screening for both client and provider is the same? Thanks for bringing this disparity into clear view!

Well Sir, it isn't and with due respect, you are misreading my postings about this topic.

1
Hobbyists rules for screening of new providers/&pimps, to provide better protection from criminal gang/s etc., may now include criminal history background checks and proof of good health i.e, recent STD screening results - and these might be posted in plain view as is required in most jurisdictions where the activity is legal.

2
Providers streamlined screening ( ATXdream started the topic) for established hobbyists DOES include looking at how long they are on this site, and their reviews. I added to that debate, this should be enough and any more is both silly and a waste of time.

3
Again thanks for your input which highlights the need for better exhibition of the difference between screening for clients by providers, on the one; and, screening for providers by clients on the other hand.
Originally Posted by sanan

Good luck on getting the info for your screening process. If you aren't willing to give up a little info, why should they give you what you want for a background check?

That is your opinion and you are, of course, entitled to it. By the same token, providers are are also entitled to use whatever screening info makes them feel safer. If you don't like it, than just stick with the BP ladies and SW's that you have reviewed in the past. I would think that the percentage of women that get robbed, raped, arrested, beaten etc is much higher with women that don't screen than with women that screen on this site and others like it.

Even if they were to screen just using your board persona, I think you would have a hard time getting an appointment. Got to love self alerts!

I am sorry but this dude is an idiot. Oh yeah and your stupid emotions are annoying as hell.