I think that's bullshit. His recent statements indicate he's not cutting the team any slack. It could be negotiations tactics, but if he's just going to cave in and give up his leverage and sell out the union, why bother to negotiate at all? Just take whatever the club offers. Originally Posted by TexTushHogYou may be right. He's looking at what Pujols and Fielder got and he's not the one dimensional player that those guys are....
I cannot see any team give him more than four years. When he gets injured the team will be holding the bag. Sure the team will insure the hell out of him to protect itself but a major injury could set a franchise's plan back. Originally Posted by pyramiderYou've got to be crazy. With the new TV money floating around the league, I'd be surprised if somebody doesn't eventually break down and offer him eight years. I predict seven, but I won't be surprised by eight. And I expect the per year to top Pujols and Fielder. Salaries always go up, especially with this much money floating around.
I think that's bullshit. His recent statements indicate he's not cutting the team any slack. It could be negotiations tactics, but if he's just going to cave in and give up his leverage and sell out the union, why bother to negotiate at all? Just take whatever the club offers. Originally Posted by TexTushHogAnd yet you were so concise with your understanding of what Cliff Lee did. How could we ever challenge you and your baseball acumen.
And yet you were so concise with your understanding of what Cliff Lee did. How could we ever challenge you and your baseball acumen.go rangers.
Oh wait, you were right about Darvish's posting fee already being paid. Wait, no, you weren't.
Selling out the union? Give me a fucking break. Even timpage made excellent points about his baggage and injury history, factors that were not there with Pujols and Fielder. Oh, and no one would give pause after seeing what happens when you sign an older player to a long term deal. How is Pujols and that mendoza line looking these days? At least Fielder is younger, ala A-Roid. Originally Posted by Boltfan
A team would be stupid to give Hamilton a seven or eight year deal. He might last through five years. Plus, the team needs to factor in finding a suitable babysitter, too. Hamilton does not pay for his sitters. Originally Posted by pyramiderThe Rangers offering 5 years means he is gone.....unless it's 5 years at $35mm per. There will be teams that will offer him 6 years at least and, if he can get in 150 games this year and continue playing anywhere near the level he is performing at now, there will be teams that will offer 8 years. Not because he can actually produce at a high level for that much longer, but because players like long-term deals.
And yet you were so concise with your understanding of what Cliff Lee did. How could we ever challenge you and your baseball acumen.Can we at least keep the discussions on the hallowed topic of baseball civil... without the insults and condescension?
Oh wait, you were right about CJ's deal. Wait, no, you weren't.
Selling out the union? Give me a fucking break. Even timpage made excellent points about his baggage and injury history, factors that were not there with Pujols and Fielder. Oh, and no one would give pause after seeing what happens when you sign an older player to a long term deal. How is Pujols and that mendoza line looking these days? At least Fielder is younger, ala A-Roid. Originally Posted by Boltfan
Can we at least keep the discussions on the hallowed topic of baseball civil... without the insults and condescension?touche mf'er!
And I always make excellent points, you shitbird. Originally Posted by timpage