Review Recommendations

Well, not to beat a dead fish, but the hobbyist who soldiers on through a green fog of unhygienic feminine odor with failing heart and burning lungs signs a confession more than writes a review. A polite calling a halt to the festivities when the first nose hairs burst into flame is a personal policy that has stood me in good stead. Good hygiene is a given and a no accompanies any review where it is lacking. There are too many ladies on our own honorable board with vaginas clean enough to eat off of to allow the smallest adjustment in standard. If it hurts it hurts.

I USUALLY don't even write a review if either, I wont go back, lady has a million positive reviews, or I wasn't surprised at the lack of menu( most bp girls).

I will give a no if my expectations were not met, (fake pics, activities, hygiene, attitude etc...)

I hope that's fair.

I don't know Shorty –– I'm the kind of girl that would prefer that someone let me know if I had a serious problem such as that...

I think it's definitely better to hear it from one person and be able to rectify the situation, than it is to have everyone talking about it behind your back! But maybe that's just me… Lol. Originally Posted by Ginger Doll

You are not alone ginger, I'd rather know in private and make adjustments than to have it whispered behind my back

I really hate being on the short end of the YMMV situation. I've visited with a couple of ladies that we just didn't click and I'm usually ok with it. Be pleasant, act like your having fun, that you are interested in me, and we will both walk away with what we want.

It's not much fun hearing no or a lame excuse when something is on the menu but its not something the lady is interested in doing that day or with me.

Overall I agree with most of this. Its just most ladies would probably get upset if you told them there poontag smells like dead fish and can you please take a shower and douche before we proceed on! Originally Posted by shorty

you don't think they get it when you're passed out on the floor and gagging?

you don't think they get it when you're passed out on the floor and gagging? Originally Posted by MrHappy4u

Some of the ladies are lacking one of your requirements (Brains), so they might not get the hint. . .

I am somewhat cautious to use a NO recommendation, because everyone has different tastes and different needs. My "would not repeat" could be the next guy's "all time fave". I will give a NO recommendation if I feel like I was misled, deceived, ripped off, or very disappointed, but often I just try to accurately describe what I experience and what another guy visiting for the first time should expect. Some guys have deal-breakers that don't apply to me. For instance, I once read a review with a NO recommendation that was mostly because she did not do DFK or DATY. I don't care about either of those things, so his NO was still a definite YES for me. I think the best thing to do is just read details to be well informed. There is a good reason that Baskin and Robbins has 31 flavors.

The business of the hobby operates like any other- only concentrated. These days if you have a bad meal or hotel room and tweet about it- you are likely to get a response from management. (I know at least one hotel chain monitors twitter for mentions and responds with an immediate fix.) But this is a smaller and more visible market.

I agree that as a "customer" a hobbyist has an obligation to voice a concern or complaint- but in a reasonable manner. Of course, in matters of hygene, there may not be an open ear even if the concern is expressed without diatribe. Of course, the other risk is that money has usually already changed hands and often been spirited away- so a customer must decide with one head or the other what to do. And again, like most markets, there are discounters and unknown quantities that are statistically always going to be higher risk than known quality providers, who generally are at the higher end of pricing.

If the experience is negative with a known high quality lady- well you can chalk it up to chemistry or a bad day. Or- iif it is an issue you know is the exception to the rule- then I think we owe to her to mention it- again without blame or crude accusations.

Amd as to being cautious of a NO recommendation. I look at it this way. If I have even the slightest concern about retaliation based on a NO recommendation- then I would not book to begin with. I hobby very carefully and not often. Many of my brothers here may have a higher tolerance for risk and adventure- for which I am grateful. But if you are dancing on the edge in you selection of playmates, you are bound to find yourself in unhappy territory eventually- so you will likely face the decision of a no vote.

With all due respect to my honorable brothers, if a man is afraid to give a "no", can his "yes" be trusted?

Good point Mr. Chan.

I have not had any "no" reviews because I have not had an experience that warranted one yet. I'm very cautious about who I see and tend to stick with well reviewed ladies. I think a review is of the experience "I" had and not what others have with the provider. Post honestly and openly without slander about my experience. Do I want to hurt someone's feelings or their business. No, but I will post about it. She was there, a negative review shouldn't be a complete surprise.

I have had several marginal experiences that I have chosen not to review because I hate to do reviews and I believe this is where the YMMV fits in. I have provided Yes recommendations and explained a few items about the session that I thought detracted from the overall experience in the ROS. This way premium access members can make an educated decision on the review and provider.

In the case of the original reveiw with a "limited" menu at a heafty donation of $$$ and being the one the wrote the review; the biggest issue was that she is inexperienced, hence the limited menu. She is a beautiful young lady with lots of potential, she just hadn't learned the ropes yet. I did give her a yes recommendation and I think she is worthy of a yes recommendation as long as a hobbyist understands the limitations, which were all pointed out in the review. I will add that I have visited her again since the original review and while I haven't had the opportunity to provide an updated review; her menu has expanded quite nicely since the first outing and I would definately give her another "yes".

As far as giving a "No" recommendation; personally, I wouldn't hesitate and I hope that no one else would either. Otherwise, we're not helping each other nor are we helping the hobby. Ultimately, enough no's are going to either drive someone out of the business or help them make some changes.

At the end of the day, for this wonderful system to work, we all need to be honest!

I've felt for some time that the reviews should include a section for activities NOT on the menu in addition to the activities that were engaged in. Most girls are unwilling to discuss the menu and the reviews are often the only source of that info. There is a big difference between not sampling an item on the menu and an item being off limits. If poor Junior out there doesn't have premium access he can see what we did, but what wasn't allowed isn't obvious and may be even more important. I've seen girls before knowing full well when I contacted them that items weren't available, but I was interested enough to try them out anyway. I gave them "yes" recommendations because they provided the services desired and I knew full well what I was and wasn't going to get. Can't fault the girl for not offering me BBBJ or DFK when I made the date knowing in advance those weren't offered.

Wonder if it would be more useful if ECCIE changed to a 5 star system.

Superstars get 5, 3 would make you think twice. 2 - four times, but at least no firm NO!

Wonder if it would be more useful if ECCIE changed to a 5 star system.

Superstars get 5, 3 would make you think twice. 2 - four times, but at least no firm NO! Originally Posted by cowtoy

Gosh, I hope I get a "Superstar!"