Sweden - The Sensible Welfare State

Im waiting for COF to come by and remind you Reagan isnt the president like he does me when I mentioned Bush


nonetheless, Regans magical revenue numbers cant erase the fact he raised the debt 189% which makes increasing revenue a moot point ..OR he raised taxes 7 times when the simpletons were busy slobbeirng over tax cuts

since you mentioned Bush inheriting a clinton recession, then you admit Obama inherited a Bush recession dont you .. that (Bush) recession came on the heels of supply side economic policies (like Reagan), and raising the debt 89% (like Reagan)

supply side starts building the economy from the top down basically ignoring the middle ... building top down while ignoring the middle defys all logic

cater to supply ( the top down builders) so they can supply the middle making sure the middle (buyers) dont have adequate $ to buy the supply.


Brilliant!

Im waiting for COF to come by and remind you Reagan isnt the president like he does me when I mentioned Bush


nonetheless, Regans magical revenue numbers cant erase the fact he raised the debt 189% which makes increasing revenue a moot point ..OR he raised taxes 7 times when the simpletons were busy slobbeirng over tax cuts

since you mentioned Bush inheriting a clinton recession, then you admit Obama inherited a Bush recession dont you .. that (Bush) recession came on the heels of supply side economic policies (like Reagan), and raising the debt 89% (like Reagan)

supply side starts building the economy from the top down basically ignoring the middle ... building top down while ignoring the middle defys all logic

cater to supply ( the top down builders) so they can supply the middle making sure the middle (buyers) dont have adequate $ to buy the supply.


Brilliant! Originally Posted by CJ7

It's amazing, you get caught mistating a fact that demonstrates your fundamental lack of knowledge of recent history and economics, and you don't even bother to acknowlege it. I pointed out that George HW Bush did not inherit a recession from Reagan, as you stated, and you don't address the error. Am I to assume this was another careless blunder caused by a full bladder?

Bush 41's recession was from July 90 to March 91 ... prior to that, he and Cheney gutted the military AND raised taxes trying to raise enough revenue to stop the vast debt Reagan left him from starting a recession ..

an immediate inheritance, no but it was damn sure the end result of the economic policy Runnin Ronnie left him


typical republitard ... I dont care if Reagan increased the debt 189% HE RAISED SOME REVENUE !!!


Obie is raising revenue too ... but not enough to offset his debt ... JUST LIKE REAGAN AND BUSH43


SING YOUR PRAISES FOR OBIE JOE !

Bush 41's recession was from July 90 to March 91 ... prior to that, he and Cheney gutted the military AND raised taxes trying to raise enough revenue to stop the vast debt Reagan left him from starting a recession ..

an immediate inheritance, no but it was damn sure the end result of the economic policy Runnin Ronnie left him


typical republitard ... I dont care if Reagan increased the debt 189% HE RAISED SOME REVENUE !!!


Obie is raising revenue too ... but not enough to offset his debt ... JUST LIKE REAGAN AND BUSH43


SING YOUR PRAISES FOR OBIE JOE ! Originally Posted by CJ7

You dismiss the fact that Reagan doubled revenue while at the same time decreasing tax rates as a moot point, that's absurd. It's hard to have a serious exchange of ideas with someone who isn't living in the real world. Yes, spending did go up during Reagan's adminstration but that was under a Democrat congress and Reagan was forced to spend to rebuild the military that had been gutted under Carter. Reagan's increase in military spending ultimately brought down the Soviet Union.

Obama's so called recovery has been one of the weakest in American history. Reagan's recovery was the strongest in American history. Deficit spending under Reagan was miniscule compared to the ocean of red ink we've seen under Obama.

CJ needs to go for the draw!

You dismiss the fact that Reagan doubled revenue while at the same time decreasing tax rates as a moot point, that's absurd. It's hard to have a serious exchange of ideas with someone who isn't living in the real world. Yes spending did go up during Reagan's adminstration but that was under a Democrat congress and Reagan was forced to spend to rebuild the military that had been gutted under Carter. Reagan's increase in military spending ultimately brought down the Soviet Union.

Obama's so called recovery has been one of the weakest in American history. Reagan's recovery was the strongest in American history. Deficit spending under Reagan was miniscule compared to the ocean of red ink we've seen under Obama. Originally Posted by joe bloe

LMAO ... thats some psyhchobabble if ever

CJ needs to go for the draw!

Originally Posted by Iaintliein

say when

England 3 Sweden 2

Does anything else matter?

CJ needs to go for the draw!

Originally Posted by Iaintliein

I have to hand it to him, even without a leg to stand on, so to speak, he persists in trying to defend failed economic policies. His stubbornness reminds me of the classic dead parrot sketch on Monty Python.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npjOSLCR2hE

LMAO ... thats some pshchobabble if ever Originally Posted by CJ7

In addition to not being to spell the word, you clearly don't know what it means either.

Psychobabble is also a psychological term used to denote the misdiagnosis and misclassification of natural variation in human psychology as psychopathological, or mentally disordered, and is based upon the premise of exaggerated overmedicalization of physiological ailments to increase profits for the medical industry

In addition to not being to spell the word, you clearly don't know what it means either.

Psychobabble is also a psychological term used to denote the misdiagnosis and misclassification of natural variation in human psychology as psychopathological, or mentally disordered, and is based upon the premise of exaggerated overmedicalization of physiological ailments to increase profits for the medical industry Originally Posted by joe bloe

^^^^^^^ what part of that doesnt describe you joe?

^^^^^^^ what part of that doesnt describe you joe? Originally Posted by CJ7

Like I said, you don't know what the word means. The word isn't used to describe a person, as in, he's such a psychobabble.

If they ever include debate competions in the Special Olympics, you should sign up. You'll get a lovely participation trophy.

Like I said, you don't know what the word means. The word isn't used to describe a person, as in, he's such a psychobabble.

If they ever include debate competions in the Special Olympics, you should sign up. You'll get a lovely participation trophy. Originally Posted by joe bloe

I wasnt describing YOU joe, pay attention

I wasnt describing YOU joe, pay attention Originally Posted by CJ7

Referencing the definition of the word psychobabble, posted directly above your comment, you wrote: "what part of that doesn't describe you joe" and then you say you weren't describing me.

Your posts have gone from weak to downright bizarre. If it wasn't for the poor quality of your prior posts, I might suspect you were having a stroke. You might want to take an aspirin, just to be on the safe side.

I'm just curious, were you drooling on yourself when you wrote that last post?

Referencing the definition of the word psychobabble, posted directly your comment, you wrote: "what part of that doesn't describe you joe" and then you say you weren't describing me.



not originaly .. the comment was directed at your inane verbiage hence psychobabble

your definition paints a picture of mental disorder, I see you in the picture.


need I say more