Only thing bothers me is there was another better defended safe house why wasn't the ambassador there.with the quick response team... Originally Posted by ekim008That's the "only thing" bothering you?
This what happens when people put party first, and Country second. If their man is in power, he can do NOTHING wrong. Originally Posted by Jackie SYep, Both parties do it.
US soil was attacked on September 11, 2012 and four Americans killed. We know the Obama White House KNEW this was a terrorist attack when it occurred. They had live time streaming video and nothing was done. Five days later the UN ambassador went on TV and blamed a video that no one had seen. Nine days later (remember the White House knew the truth) Obama went in front of the UN and blamed the video and expressed misgivings about the right to free speech. Obama goes on the View and lies to the American people saying we have no proof it was a terrorist attack (remermber the White House knew). It took 24 days for an investigation to begin after journalist and locals picked through the rubble. Someone from the State Department or above rejected repeated requests for greater security. We know that the Obama White House was told but we are told by Biden that they (he and Barack) didn't know about anything. The intelligence community has said that blaming them to protect your political interests is not the kind of leadership this country needs. Obama is apparently trying to blame everything on Ambassador? Rice. Did I get something wrong?Fixed that for you.
You were all up in arms when you falsely claimed that Bush was cherry picking intelligence, you claimed that Bush lied (and that was refuted), you protested when Bush told you things that you didn't want to hear. You were so angry then, why aren't you angry now? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I don't recall any terrorist attack on U.S. soil this year, fill me in on that. Originally Posted by acp5762Embassies are legally the soil of the embassy's home country, not the soil of the host country. An attack on an embassy is an attack on the embassy's home country, and an overt act of war, and has been considered such for a VERY long time.
That's the "only thing" bothering you?
Where was this "better defended safe house"? and
What "quick response team"?
Does it bother you that the administration pulled security earlier?
Does it bother you that the administration pulled an "escape" airplane?
Does it bother you that the administration has been lying about it?
Does it bother you that the administration is still lying about it?
Does it bother you that 4 good men died needlessly?
Does it bother you that Bidenoxious laughs about it on national TV?
With all due respect, our country can do better than that.
Hillary got her 3 a.m. phone call. She botched it. We knew "he" would. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Interesting how some can make light of the death of a US Ambassador and 3 other Americans, including Navy Seals. However, this is an outrage, and the attempt of the President to deflect blame, and cover up the truth is an impeachable offense. If Obama had any decency, he'd resign. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyYou're probably right. It could be construed as derelection of his duties. Like Biden was trying to imply during the debate that this administration didn't know the Embassy had requested additional security is a crock of shit. They did know and they should have known. There had been talk of a need to step up security forces and they ignored it.The other big lie is the mayhem stemmed from a video. The attack was planned and premeditated, which had nothing to do with a video. Another big problem that will unravel this even further was they put Candoliza Rice up to a press conference and she was unable to offer any credible information, when Clinton should have stepped up to the plate on this situation. Although I agree with you that this incidence holds grounds for impeachment it won't happen of course being so close to election. But it could hurt Obama's chances now for re-election.
You're probably right. It could be construed as derelection of his duties. Like Biden was trying to imply during the debate that this administration didn't know the Embassy had requested additional security is a crock of shit. They did know and they should have known. There had been talk of a need to step up security forces and they ignored it.The other big lie is the mayhem stemmed from a video. The attack was planned and premeditated, which had nothing to do with a video. Another big problem that will unravel this even further was they put Candoliza Rice up to a press conference and she was unable to offer any credible information, when Clinton should have stepped up to the plate on this situation. Although I agree with you that this incidence holds grounds for impeachment it won't happen of course being so close to election. But it could hurt Obama's chances now for re-election. Originally Posted by acp5762It's Susan Rice. She's a lying stooge for Obama.