Are you ready of the October surprise?

Inhear he's now gone to crapping the bed.

Bitchita Whineman, on the other hand, only has a chemical head in his bunker, so it doesn't matter where, when or what he craps!

Okay, KNOCK IT THE FUCK OFF! This thread is about a possible October surprise which is now being talked about on TV after I posted it. It is not about poopy pants and Whatzup's fetishes. Now if you don't have anything pertinent to add then go fuck off. This is our country at stake.

. This is our country at stake. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Yes Chicken Little it is.

Don't let the sky hit you in the dirty ass on the way out of your own thread if you do not like the direction it has taken.

JD, if and it is a big IF, there is actually a deal in the works between the US and Iran, what would you prefer the Administration do? Apparently, you would prefer that the Administration tell Iran to sit on this issue until after the election so there will not be another in a long of conspiracy theorists (who claim to be proud Americans) making up bull shit stories only because they have nothing better to do with their worthless time than doing their best Mel Gibson (Jerry Fletcher) impersonation.

Where the hell do you live JD, LaLaLand?

Consider this thought for a moment. If the killing of OBL had never occurred and this morning the intelligence community notified the President that there was a 50/50 chance that OBL was in the compound that he was eventually killed at. How would you react if the President went on FAUX News and told the the following to the world (and OBL):

OBL please do not leave the compound because we want to kill you but now is not the right time for us to pull the trigger. The US prefers to wait until after the election because we have a bunch of idiots (masquerading as concerned American citizens) who are more concerned with "conspiracy theories" than seizing the moment and pulling the trigger now! In other words, OBL you are confined to quarters until the time is right for the Navy Seals to move in and kill your worthless ass!

As far as I am concerned, if there is a deal close to being finalized with Iran that would reduce their nuclear capability and/or threat, Obama should seize the moment and wrap the deal up immediately. Screw a bunch of conspiracy idiots (like yourself) worried about an October Surprise and how it might possibly impact the November election.

How do you like them apples?

JD, If and that is a big IF, there is actually a deal in the works between the US and Iran, .... Originally Posted by bigtex

There has been "a deal in the works" regarding Iran through several administrations. BT, you are wise beyond your ears. (Not a typo)

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ld-talks-iran/

THE PROBLEM with the current administration is .... credibility. Zero.

Was it an "act of terrorism" or a movie?

And of course like all of Obaminable's "plans" ...

.... they come AFTER THE ELECTION.

The recent revelations and the post-2nd-debate "corrections" have apparently resulted in Obaminable sliding 2 points in one day (Friday to Saturday) and with the candidates in a statistical dead heat in Ohio with Romney picking up leads in other key states ....

... even before the Romney ad blitz contracted for the next 2 weeks.

I suspect that unlike Kerry, ....

.... Mr. Romney will make an election day stop in Ohio to seal the deal.

Let's see, ok?

category

There has been "a deal in the works" regarding Iran through several administrations.
Originally Posted by LexusLover

Sorry I misrepresented my thoughts LL! I will try not to do so again. I certainly do not want to get on your bad side!

Perhaps it would have been more appropriate for me to say, IF they are very close to a final deal or even IF a deal is imminent (take your pick).

With that said, my criticism of JD's (and now by extension, LL's) ignorant October Surprise thread remains the same. Apparently, LL (or is LL's real name Jerry Fletcher) falls under the "Conspiracy Theory" category as opposed to doing what is right for America. Is anyone surprised? LL still believes his personal hero (GW's) ill fated and ill advised spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq was justified. BTW, do you recall me telling you at the time that the spring of 2003 invasion was a mistake? If not, I did!

LL's condescending attitude, arrogance and ignorance (not a typo) never surprises me! Truth be known, LL is so confused that he regularly refers to himself as being a Democrat. Fact of the matter is, LL was a TEA NUT LUNATIC long before being a TEA NUT LUNATIC was cool!

LL, while we are at it we might as well send a "Screw You" your way too! You've earned it!!!!!

There, feel better now?

Sorry I mis-wrote. Originally Posted by bigtex

What else is new?

I'm not concerned, BT, Obaminable will not do "right" for the country.

He hasn't yet (other than give the green light for a bullet for OBL and for the pirates).

In anticipation of the socialists giving the nod for four more years of an affirmative action presidency, I have taken steps to immunize myself from the oppresssive pile up of national debt married to unprecedented inflation and unequaled stagnation in the availability of discretionary loans for the funding for business growth. In addition any overseas traveling will be only for business and necessity, since the current numb-skull you are touting as a "leader" will simply apologize for my presence on foreign soil and look for a movie to blame on the reaction.

Otherwise, how are things in Austin?

Have you figured out where Clarksville is? Or what it was?

It is difficult to be a Democrat these days, I admit. But I have faith in our party and expect that once the infatuation wears off and the blow back from having an inept-incompetent sitting behind a desk at 1600 for 8 years subsides, then someone, besides you, will wake up, smell the coffee, and realize that "political correctness" and "social courtesies" need to take a backseat to a pragmatic, economic approach to getting this country back on its financial and international footing. Until then I will just have to vote a "mixed" ticket while ignoring party affiliations.

When will you ever get over McCain losing to Bush?

It is difficult to be a Democrat these days, I admit. But I have faith in our party and expect that once the infatuation wears off Originally Posted by LexusLover

Ahhhhhhhh, the condescending attitude and arrogance rears its ugly head once again. To LL, it seems to flow like a mountain stream during springtime!

I am also glad to see that LL has (once again) openly expressed his long standing affiliation to the Democratic Party in writing! I felt quite confident that he would swallow the bait! All I had to do was reel the mullet in, hook, line and sinker!

While on the subject, LL's reference to "our party" appears to be an attempt on his part to drag me into his political inner circle of TEA NUTS, LUNATICS and FANATICS. Let the record reflect that I do not wish to have anything to do with LL, his fellow TEA NUTS, the LUNATICS and/or the FANATICS that share his political ideology!

LOWER GAS PRICES....

LOWER GAS PRICES.... Originally Posted by Whirlaway

That's a surprise. As much gas as Whirly has, I would have thought he would want higher gas prices!

Well LL, Iran could always take you and JD hostage and we could trade them weapons for cash and see if they would throw you two nuts in on the deal like your hero Ronnie Reagan! .


http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexpe...e/reagan-iran/

In 1985, while Iran and Iraq were at war, Iran made a secret request to buy weapons from the United States. McFarlane sought Reagan's approval, in spite of the embargo against selling arms to Iran. McFarlane explained that the sale of arms would not only improve U.S. relations with Iran, but might in turn lead to improved relations with Lebanon, increasing U.S. influence in the troubled Middle East. Reagan was driven by a different obsession. He had become frustrated at his inability to secure the release of the seven American hostages being held by Iranian terrorists in Lebanon. As president, Reagan felt that "he had the duty to bring those Americans home," and he convinced himself that he was not negotiating with terrorists. While shipping arms to Iran violated the embargo, dealing with terrorists violated Reagan's campaign promise never to do so. Reagan had always been admired for his honesty.

The arms-for-hostages proposal divided the administration. Longtime policy adversaries Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger and Secretary of State George Shultz opposed the deal, but Reagan, McFarlane and CIA director William Casey supported it. With the backing of the president, the plan progressed. By the time the sales were discovered, more than 1,500 missiles had been shipped to Iran. Three hostages had been released, only to be replaced with three more, in what Secretary of State George Shultz called "a hostage bazaar."

What would be a real October surprise is if something JD touted would come true...

Ahhhhhhhh, the condescending attitude and arrogance rears its ugly head once again. Originally Posted by bigtex

....

Were you opening wide, or just mis-writing.

I suppose you supported and voted for McGovern then. Since you are "party" guy! He comes to mind because of his death.

Did you support and vote for LBJ?

Kennedy?

Carter?

Connally?

Did someone tell me that Hillary was once a Goldwater Girl?

Or was that just a wet dream of mine? Your babe, Hillary.

So, you spin time in Austin .....

... and you still don't know what or where is ... Clarksville?

Any Austin Democrat worth his salt would. Especially an Obama-Democrat!

Your stripes are showing, BT.

....



Did someone tell me that Hillary was once a Goldwater Girl?

Or was that just a wet dream of mine? , Originally Posted by LexusLover

Hilliary was a wet dream of yours?

You are way more fuc'd in the head than we all thought!

....



I suppose you supported and voted for McGovern then. Since you are "party" guy!

BT. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Don't talk shit about McGovern, COG will open a can of whipass on you!

COG, my condolences. McGovern was way ahead of his time, just like Jimmy Carter. Great men who were pummeled by the likes of folks like LL.

When will you ever get over McCain losing to Bush? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Even sticks in your throat, does it BT?

You traded McCain for Obaminble, because Bush beat him? A Real Loyalist.