I like rolling things this way for these simple reasons -Agreed to 4.
1. Does the provider actually screen? A safe provider makes a safe hobbyist.
2. If our mutual needs don't mesh - activities, time/rate, then there will not be a number three.
3. If all above is agreed upon, time and date become less important, as my working schedule is not always to my timing. If #1 and #2 have already been met, then I know who to contact when our schedules are mutually beneficial.
4. If all of the above is achieved, then a first time meeting is more like old friends without all of the other awkwardness. Originally Posted by Doglegg
HOWEVER (aaand here it comes, lol....waaaait for it
). All well and good, so long as the applicant isn't expecting a speedy turnaround. I prefer all out commitment from a potential client with the initiative to recon "activities/menu" first. Screening IS time consuming; emailing, etc, especially from a phone, can be extremely time-consuming in light of the fact that many of us have fulltime responsibilites requiring the bulk of our time and attention directed elsewhere. Be informed, I say, lol! (Vote "White Queen" ) Reviews, interestngly enough (worthy of note, shall We say), are a great deal more than soft porn From a seasoned vet's perspective, I appreciate:
"Hi, my name is...I do such and such (when I'm not out trolling for cooch, lol). Age, physical description, applicable references, and approximate date/time/activity sought."
I can then respond with my particular screening criteria, if not already covered, and SCORE (on both ends, lol).
Tres efficient .
At any rate
, mein .02$...give or take a benji , heheheh...TWQ
Thanks for all of your time, And don't forget to VOTE!!!! 
Vinny
lol....