The Bengazi conspiracy crap starts to unravel

This is the Looney Rights 11 Step Playbook for losing two elections in a row to a Democratic President. It is self explanatory!

1) Lose the election to the incumbent Democratic President
2) Immediately throw the losing Republican nominee for President under the bus
3) Bus driver repeatedly runs over the lifeless corpse
4) Grasp at straws
5) Pull their hair out
6) Find something to bitch and moan about hoping something will eventually stick
7) Try desperately to make their bitches and moans into a scandal
8) Try desperately to take it through the impeachment process
9) Fall well short of their only 2nd term agenda item, which is to have the President removed from office
10) Blame the President for failing to accomplish anything during his 2nd term in office
11) Repeat the process the next time a Democrat wins a 2nd term as POTUS! Originally Posted by bigtex

+1

Why is it that wanting to find out the truth to an issue is bad?

It's not bad to want to know the truth. I think we know the truth. The facts are sometimes harder to gather.

And when the process is one third fact-finding and two thirds pissing and moaning, it becomes a little more difficult and a lot less significant.

Can you say "BACKFIRE?"

Where are you Little Timmy? You haven't yet explained how the White House had nothing to do with the initial "talking points" yet broadcast the initial "talking points" for over a two week period!?! What's the story, Little Timmy? Why did Odumbo and the rest of the White House gang peddle the dumbed-down, fallacious version that Ambassador Rice spread around the MSM and not the "big boy story" with the truth and the facts? Are you arguing that Odumbo as POTUS is so stupidly insignificant that no one bothered to inform him that it was a terrorist attack and all he had to go on was the dumbed-down, fallacious version that Ambassador Rice spread around the MSM, Little Timmy?

That's kind of what Timmy was arguing, IB. I think you nailed it.

The fuse has been lit on the Benghazi scandal (metaphorically speaking), so it's just a matter of time before it all blows up in Obama's face. (Again, speaking metaphorically.)

conjecture and speculation ..

you HOPE it blows up in Obies face

That's kind of what Timmy was arguing, IB. I think you nailed it.

The fuse has been lit on the Benghazi scandal (metaphorically speaking), so it's just a matter of time before it all blows up in Obama's face. (Again, speaking metaphorically.) Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

This is the Looney Rights 11 Step Playbook for losing two elections in a row to a Democratic President. It is self explanatory!

1) Lose the election to the incumbent Democratic President
2) Immediately throw the losing Republican nominee for President under the bus
3) Bus driver repeatedly runs over the lifeless corpse
4) Grasp at straws
5) Pull their hair out
6) Find something to bitch and moan about hoping something will eventually stick
7) Try desperately to make their bitches and moans into a scandal
8) Try desperately to take it through the impeachment process
9) Fall well short of their only 2nd term agenda item, which is to have the President removed from office
10) Blame the President for failing to accomplish anything during his 2nd term in office
11) Repeat the process the next time a Democrat wins a 2nd term as POTUS!

Time will tell, BigTurd. Time will tell.

This is the Looney Rights 11 Step Playbook for losing two elections in a row to a Democratic President. It is self explanatory!

1) Lose the election to the incumbent Democratic President
2) Immediately throw the losing Republican nominee for President under the bus
3) Bus driver repeatedly runs over the lifeless corpse
4) Grasp at straws
5) Pull their hair out
6) Find something to bitch and moan about hoping something will eventually stick
7) Try desperately to make their bitches and moans into a scandal
8) Try desperately to take it through the impeachment process
9) Fall well short of their only 2nd term agenda item, which is to have the President removed from office
10) Blame the President for failing to accomplish anything during his 2nd term in office
11) Repeat the process the next time a Democrat wins a 2nd term as POTUS! Originally Posted by bigtex

BigKoTex, as an anal suppository you have your head so far up Odumbo's ass you cannot fathom the topic of Little Timmy's thread.

Answer this question, BigKoTex: Why did Odumbo trot out Ambassador Rice with a fallacious story which Odumbo, et al, continued to spread for two weeks after the event in the face of facts contradicting that story? Little Timmy's post shows the desperation of the left as it tries to deflect the story on to her and ignore the fact that Odumbo, et al, were telling the same story.

It is an ignorant and fallacious claim to say that Odumbo, et al, had nothing to do with the "talking points" when Odumbo, et al, CHOSE to use those "talking points" rather than the Benghazi information they had at hour one!

Time will tell, BigTurd. Time will tell. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

StupidOldLumpyFart, it is a time-honored 11 Point Plan conceived by the Far Right Wing-Nut Braintrust. And you guys swallow the bait, hook, line and sinker.

Special emphasis on you guys!

(In other words, StupidOldLumpyFart is one of 'em!)

The fuse has been lit on the Benghazi scandal (metaphorically speaking), so it's just a matter of time before it all blows up in Obama's face. (Again, speaking metaphorically.)

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Kind of like the 14,781 other issues you've whined about over the last few years?

Kind of like the 14,781 (and counting) other issues you've whined about over the last few years? Originally Posted by Doove

I fixed it for you!

As soon as Petraeus testified, McCain even shut the fuck up.

Teapublicans - Irrelevant, whiny losers, as usual.

So why were those unclassified talking points created in the first place?

Officials say they were produced in response to requests from the House Select Committee on Intelligence for language that could be used in media interviews.

The main purpose was to provide talking points sensitive to the fact that there could be legal proceedings in the future, the senior official said. Initial intelligence was tenuous, and affiliations were unclear.
Investigators also worried the investigation could be compromised if they provided too much information.

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...beginning?lite

It is an ignorant and fallacious claim to say that Odumbo, et al, had nothing to do with the "talking points" when Odumbo, et al, CHOSE to use those "talking points" rather than the true story about the Benghazi attack!