Barley for brains is an IDIOT. Who doesn't remember Jessica Lynch?Let's also keep track of anyone who uses phrases like "Teapublicans".
Let's cut to the chase:
Lots of GUNS at Fort Hood and we STILL had a mass killing!
Fuck you, the Teapublicans AND that other lying sack of shit, Wayne La Pierre, the head liar at the NRA! You are fools! Not only should we get rid of giant magazines and 100-round drums, we should keep a list of every militia wannabe that buys black SWAT look-alike uniforms and body armor! Originally Posted by Little Stevie
Let's also keep track of anyone who uses phrases like "Teapublicans".
Not for any nefarious purposes, of course.
Just to help the government keep track of all of, and provides services to, our "special needs" citizens. Originally Posted by ExNYer
Little Stevie, you do not know what the hell you are talking about. Like usual. The shooting at Fort Hood occurred in a gun free zone. Soldiers on military bases in this country usually do not carry weapons on them. Only the military police on bases in this country are armed. Had these soldiers been armed, the carnage at Fort Hood would have been limited. Only 4 minutes elapsed between the time that the shooting started and the time that the female civilian police officer responded and shot Hasan who still killed 13 soldiers and wounded many others in this brief amount of time.. Like I said had these soldiers been armed, the situation would have been defused very quickly with only minimal casualities.Did you ever serve in the armed forces? I did and there were very few enlisted men that I would have liked to have seen armed on my military base. Consumption of alcohol for those living on base was the primary weekend recreation and to think of all these people carrying guns. Wow!!
http://www.morningjournal.com/articl.../mj1856795.txt
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/200...-at-fort-hood/ Originally Posted by NiceGuy53
Well when I served, alcohol was actually the tertiary libation... And ALL of us had M-16s. Originally Posted by Yssup RiderVery true. In a war zone. Scary but true. In the U.S. military bases, you carried an UNLOADED M-16 while on guard duty. When you were done with guard duty, the M-16 was returned to whomever and locked up. Don't know about you, but I never had a handgun in my hands during my time in the army. It just isn't standard issue.
Very true. In a war zone. Scary but true. In the U.S. military bases, you carried an UNLOADED M-16 while on guard duty. When you were done with guard duty, the M-16 was returned to whomever and locked up. Don't know about you, but I never had a handgun in my hands during my time in the army. It just isn't standard issue. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXBy the late 60's, M-16's had become standard issue. Handguns were mostly for show behind the lines, usually by visiting, upper grade officers! In any event, there was always an M-16 nearby should the need for more firepower arise.
Very true. In a war zone. Scary but true. In the U.S. military bases, you carried an UNLOADED M-16 while on guard duty. When you were done with guard duty, the M-16 was returned to whomever and locked up. Don't know about you, but I never had a handgun in my hands during my time in the army. It just isn't standard issue. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXBy the late 60's/early 70's, M-16's had become standard issue. Handguns were few and far between.
I wonder if you would like to pay extra taxes to cover the insurance costs for armed teachers ? Originally Posted by CJ7Uhhhhh, no they don't. Nor do I.