observation

  • 1
  • 2
I agree with Petite that "frequently reviewed" is not necessarily synonymous with "high volume". Most of the ladies mentioned in this thread would not be considered "high volume" by most standards.
Guest042416's Avatar
lee would be high volume
but now she utr,
my intention was not to draw attention to this lovely lady just to compliment her on her hotness.
my intention was not to draw attention to this lovely lady just to compliment her on her hotness. Originally Posted by tommylove
I can't resist. How do you "not draw attention" to a lady by starting a thread about her?
well there was an underlying apology in my last post to this lovely lady
Tommy, no apology needed. Your thread ended up allowing several beloved ladies to be recognized in a positive light. Thanks.
AlbanyBlonde's Avatar
Maybe you should rephrase...
"...draw negative attention to this lovely lady..."
well i will let this rest. hope this lovelylady is not upset over this and would permit me to see her sometime
oh and albanyblonde you are lovely also
Guest042416's Avatar
good thread, i dont think he meant it as a negative, all good girls.
SweetElizabeth's Avatar
I agree with Petite that "frequently reviewed" is not necessarily synonymous with "high volume". Most of the ladies mentioned in this thread would not be considered "high volume" by most standards. Originally Posted by jackfengshui
There is DEFINITELY a distinction......
pyramider's Avatar
There is a review section? What will they thinck of next ... an ads section?
  • 1
  • 2