I hope the ladies do not read the content of my posts. I am afraid their expectations of my prowess will scare them off ... Originally Posted by pyramider
Firstly, I'll agree that not to respond is rude. But one must consider Newton's Third Law of Motion: every action has an equal and opposite reaction. I would hope that your introductory emails find themselves polite, complimentary, and inclusive of all information that she would need to screen you.This is random, but I absolutely love your site Tiffani... You're such a beauty!
P411 pre-screenings usually work best. (I don't know who doesn't respond to P411 requests.)
If I were to only consider reviews, I would consider how many reputable ladies you've met, and who could be used as a reference. I don't care about 'No' recommendations, but I would hope that they aren't consistent, and in the relative 'beginning' of your review writing career. It shows that you have learned how to pick the right kind of ladies to have a good time with.
@shlub I thought managed providers and back to back bookers lived for same day appointments. I'm not understanding how you got that women who don't do short notice appointments are managed or a back-to back booker in the first place. I have never met a woman who screen think guys who call and expect short notice appointments, especially with little to no screening, to be dangerous to see.
Non-review writers are welcome with me. But non-reviewers who like short notice providers will have to send a wonderful introductory Pre-screening email inclusive of a general schedule outline/timing expectations so that I would feel comfortable meeting. Originally Posted by Tiffani Jameson