symbols are not facts

Guest062813-1's Avatar
isn't the "donation" for time spent only? Originally Posted by JCM800
Of course it is. However, say a review went something like this:

Description: I put the money down on the table played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw....then she proceeded to give me the best bj of my life her hott, tight mouth all over my cock dripping wet. I flipped that bitch over shoved my cock into her tight pussy and BOOM I exploded in pure extasy.

Best 20 dollars I ever spent!

Anyone else see the problem......

Not to mention that site had very minimal security....
Guest062813-1's Avatar
OMG! Hell yea, lol, I had so many reviews on there too. That was the first site I was on. But, I agree, not everybody is smart and that makes it worse for us professional & legit ladies and gents. Originally Posted by Gemma34
Agreed! Don't mess the game up! One dumbass can change everything. Couldn't have said it better myself. Gemma you seem like an intelligent lady. <3
JCM800's Avatar
Description: I put the money down on the table played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw....then she proceeded to give me the best bj of my life her hott, tight mouth all over my cock dripping wet. I flipped that bitch over shoved my cock into her tight pussy and BOOM I exploded in pure extasy. Originally Posted by Miss Cherry
nice review.... did she allow CIM?
...played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw... Originally Posted by Miss Cherry
Glad to see you included DATY activity in your scenario! Smart girl!
luvlittlemilkers's Avatar
I wish all the reviews were written like this...it would save me a lot of money.

Of course it is. However, say a review went something like this:

Description: I put the money down on the table played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw....then she proceeded to give me the best bj of my life her hott, tight mouth all over my cock dripping wet. I flipped that bitch over shoved my cock into her tight pussy and BOOM I exploded in pure extasy.

Best 20 dollars I ever spent!

Anyone else see the problem......

Not to mention that site had very minimal security.... Originally Posted by Miss Cherry
KCQuestor's Avatar
It is commonly accepted that $ means "US$100" ("one hundred dollars in US currency") and $$ means "US$200" and $$.50 means "US$250." It is commonly accepted that BBBJ means 'bareback blowjob" ("oral sex without a condom") and CIM means "cum in mouth" (or "ejaculation into the mouth"). These statements could easily be shown to be true in a court of law.

Therefore, saying "I paid her $$ for BBBJ and CIM" is no different from saying "I paid her two hundred dollars for a blowjob without a condom and I ejaculated into her mouth." The codes do NOTHING to protect clients or providers. The codes are either convenient (in the case of "BBBJ" and "CIM") or ridiculous (in the case of "$.5").

The stuff about "dreams"? Bullshit.
The stuff about "roses", "diamonds", "kisses"? Bullshit.
The stuff about "time spent for companionship only"? Bullshit.

If you paid a woman for sex, all the euphemisms in the world won't protect you from prosecution if they want to get you.

The only money codes that don't bother me much (as if anyone cares what bothers me) are "$$" and "$$$" as both of those are unambiguous and shorter than saying $200 or $300. Everything else is not worth doing.
It
The only money codes that don't bother me much (as if anyone cares what bothers me) are "$$" and "$$$" as both of those are unambiguous and shorter than saying $200 or $300. Everything else is not worth doing. Originally Posted by KCQuestor
Finally, I caught on and urban dictionary helped out
I am not a fan of text talk, likely since I am in school and read quite a bit. Reading is a process that I learned by memorizing words when I was little, not sounding them out. So I read by scanning.
This means I'm not used to the "text-talk". It's used my most people these days, and it trips up my scanning since I pretty much have to look at letters and then stop and think what they have said.
Not a light of time, but definite bumps in my reading, which used to bug me. But I'm getting used to people doing that, as I'm used to see so many fat people eating large quantities of food then blaming genetics for their CVD or diabetes.
KCQuestor's Avatar
But I'm getting used to people doing that, as I'm used to see so many fat people eating large quantities of food then blaming genetics for their CVD or diabetes. Originally Posted by blade78
Where did THAT come from?
dirty dog's Avatar
Where did THAT come from? Originally Posted by KCQuestor
KC I think the poster is Rex Reed
@#%$#$^%&%^%$# What did I say?
Of course it is. However, say a review went something like this:

Description: I put the money down on the table played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw....then she proceeded to give me the best bj of my life her hott, tight mouth all over my cock dripping wet. I flipped that bitch over shoved my cock into her tight pussy and BOOM I exploded in pure extasy.

Best 20 dollars I ever spent!

Anyone else see the problem......

Not to mention that site had very minimal security.... Originally Posted by Aceysexyazz
HILARIOUS! I don't care who you are, this shit is funny as hell! You are hilarious girl, yet you make a very good point.