A 2006 law requiring the postal service to pay an average of $5.5 billion annually for 10 years to finance retiree health costs for the next 75 years was the idea of Congress so they could apply that amount to the federal budget although it was not true income.
Originally Posted by BigLouie
Other than this statement not making much factual sense ...
"so they could apply that amount to the federal budget although it was not true income" ...
given the realities of the post office it seems appropriate that the post office take care of its own retirees and get them off the government tit. Your man Obaminable has already announced that the Post Office is a good working example of how Obamacare would be operated .... are you suggesting that was bullshit?
Unfortunately weekly I must go to the post office to process mail and too many times I have seen 15 to 20 CUSTOMERS in line waiting for their turn in front of 2 agents, a 3rd one comes out, then one of the other two close their station and take a "mandatory" break ... while the CUSTOMERS are still waiting!
Mentality: (test screening issue) Had an agent complain to me that I pre-posted my mail and then asked them to scan it for verification, BECAUSE the Post Office wasn't getting the POSTAGE!!!!
Electronic mailing (progress) hurts the post office, but the post office hurts itself. Constantly reducing services to cut costs.