So everyone should follow your guidelines of safe driving, and appease your wishes because, otherwise, it ticks you off.
Some vehicles take longer than others to stop (it's called law of inertia); other considerations also apply - like weather conditions, condition and/or age of the vehicle's tires and/or brakes, person's age and/or mental/physical disposition affecting reaction times, and a host of others.
I'm sorry, but if someone needs 3 car lengths on a dry, sunny day moving at a pace of less than 5 mph (which is the situation I was speaking of) then they probably shouldn't be on the road if mental/physical/mechanical conditions warrant such behavior; let alone doing it in the outside lane. Inertia is almost nil at such a speed. There is safe driving and there is also curteous driving which that is not.
I, myself, follow the several car lengths rule at the higher speeds that require it, but when traffic is moving at the pace of someone doing a brisk walk, no.
I never stated if they were right or wrong. Yes, it ticks me off because it isn't curteous to other drivers. There is safe and there is too safe. Consider this, if traffic is flowing at 65 and you want to do 30 because you feel it's safer, a cop will issue a ticket for unsafe driving because traffic conditions dictate a faster speed. Originally Posted by Sternomancer
I think all parties involved (as drivers) in an accident should have a mandatory license suspension for at least a week, perhaps a month, (the first time, and progressively longer on subsequent events). There is NO innocent party in a wreck... someone was NOT driving defensively and thus could have prevented the accident... and the OP was driving like a fool... well if there is a fool on the road near you, it would behoove you to get the hell away from them. (you fault for not watching your ass), or had the attitude of "fuck you! I'm driving here!! There's no winner in a wreck (ridiculous insurance awards aside)
the goal would be to stop having wrecks and so if everyone knew that a wreck, no matter who gets the ticket, would have a suspended license mandated... more folks would either straighten up, or would be in an accident. Either way, there would be a hell of a lot more room on the roads, at least until manners, and attitudes were adjusted. Have I had wrecks, yep! Do I avoid them now.. yessir!
I hear the traffic is light in Sanderson Tx... try going there for a while. Originally Posted by nuglet
Yes birdbrain, I do. and for your info. I have ridden motorcycles for about 5 decades and more than once I have saved my butt by allowing safety space in front of me so when some jerk (perhaps the "dumbest thing") behind the wheel in a vehicle behind me decides he started slowing down too late and my only notice is squealing tires. I don't even look, I just start moving forward to hopefully avoid inclusion in his error, or look for room between lanes to get the hell out of the way. The word MR BUDMAN, is DEFENSIVE driving. Operating a 1-2 ton vehicle is NOT A RIGHT... it's a privilege.You are a fucking idiot. I can think of many circumstances that occur where ther is only one person at fault. Have I avoided accidents by defensive driving, hell yes. Have I been in situations where you have zero control over the events happening around you, hell yes. I too rode bikes for years but that doesn't mean shit in regards to your dumb ass statement. How about this scenario genius, someone runs a red light and t-bones you, I guess it was your fault. Get real.
I can see which camp you're in though. Have I ever had an "accident"? YEP, more than I care to recall over the years.
Was it my fault... ? Well, if I had been paying more attention than I was, I would not have been involved. After all, who really wins (stupid insurance awards not withstanding)
Did I learn from it... yessir I did.
You're are apparently making excuses for your own lapse of attention to arriving safely without hurting anyone. Just the type I watch for in traffic.
Accident? BS, but that's ok, you probably confessed this morning so all is right in your universe. Originally Posted by nuglet
Dude, I have to agree with down41 on this. Using your logic how do you know the guy pulling in front of you is not on the way to the hospital? That's kind of a moronic argument. If you are in slow stop and go traffic you need to stay within a car length of the vehicles in front of you. If traffic is moving along at a decent pace and you are in the left lane you need to be passing other cars or move the fuck over. The problem with drivers everywhere is so many think they are the only ones that matter and if they think the proper speed is 45 then everybody doing more is the problem. Pick your speed and do it in the proper lane. Rush hour traffic sucks for all of us regardless of the city you are in but doing your part to keep traffic moving is a plus. Quit gawking at the wreck on the other side of the highway and stay up with the flow of traffic will help a bunch. Originally Posted by BudmanI don't know jack. But do I care to gamble ? No.
It's apparent, even to the layman, that YOU sir, have appointed yourself the traffic regulator; and that you are trying to justify your logic. Your "If -> Then -> Else -> ElseIf" attempt at self justification may make sense to you, but please keep your judgments to yourself, instead of pushing it onto others. In fact, you are attempting to brew up nothing but ignorant assumptions into a potion of self righteousness.You're the guy driving like a lame ass in rush hour with a compromised mental condition talking on his cell phone to rape victims. Why don't you retire to the country? I DO live in a city. Where most people on the road hate guys like you.
How do you know that the person on the cell is not talking to a person who just got raped and is headed to the hospital, or of a matter of similar urgency demanding immediate attention? Maybe they are allowing for the extra space because they recognize that they are operating under conditions where their mental disposition has been compromised ?
But, according to your logic, they should pull over and call an ambulance and be driven there and they should not be on the road at all. Is that because they are a danger, or because they are in your way, or because your destination is of greater value than theirs ?
Again, your time is not more important than mine, or the pimple faced kid in front of you. And it's not all back and white.
Glass bubble comes to mind.
You live in a city. Learn to share. Otherwise, consider retiring to the country where the next house is 3 miles up the road, sir. Originally Posted by rrrabbit