Dick Morris incorrectly predicts election

No, he's a complete idiot. Quit while you're ahead, Timmy. You got one right.

Voted "twice", what a shlemiel....

This Ohio Democrat (and poll worker) voted 6 times for Obama !!!!!!!!

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...eliana-johnson

I don't know if you're actually Jewish, but if you are, you're nuts voting for Obama. He wants Israel to return to the 1967 borders; that would be suicide for Israel. Obama is an anti-semite.

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/david-m...te-for-israel/ Originally Posted by joe bloe

Yes, it would be suicide for Israel, but they aren't going to do it. Israel tells the US what to do, not the other way around.
I'm Jewish and I assume it comes through in my postings, such as this: Israel First!!

You got that right Joe; and add into the mix Chris Christi kneecapping Romney days before the vote........

On a side note - Presidential Debate Commission Co-Chair Frank Fahrenkopf recently stated that selecting Crowley as a moderator was a "mistake".

According to Jon Ralston, the Nevada-based political journalist, Fahrenkopf told the audience there that he was proud of the 2012 debate moderators, but added: “We made one mistake this time: Her name is Candy."

Obama got 50.4%. Romney got 48.1%. That's hardly losing by a shitload. Had the Benghazi issue gone differently, Romney probably could have made up the 2.3% difference.

Candy Crowley succeeded in doing to Romney, what Dan Rather tried and failed to do to George W Bush in 2004. Originally Posted by joe bloe

The Reps should have won by a significant margine in 2012. Essentially everything was in their favor for a 55-45 kind of win--except their own stupidity. They did not run an electable personality. They let a completely vulnerable incumbant off the hook because in essence they did not compete. Unfortunately, the RWWs who tried would have been even more of a wipeout. Until the Reps toss Rove & the TPs out, get some sane people in, the results are unlikely to be different. And that is ultimately bad for everyone because without a serious competition the Dems can get just as wacky in the other direction. The middle of the bell curve on the political spectrum has almost no good options on who to vote for.

Obama is not an anti-Semite, he's just tired of what you point out....that Israel tells us what to do. Israel exists because of us and they get mixed up about that sometimes. They need to be reminded.

Yes, it would be suicide for Israel, but they aren't going to do it. Israel tells the US what to do, not the other way around.
I'm Jewish and I assume it comes through in my postings, such as this: Israel First!! Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

The Reps should have won by a significant margine in 2012. Essentially everything was in their favor for a 55-45 kind of win--except their own stupidity. They did not run an electable personality. They let a completely vulnerable incumbant off the hook because in essence they did not compete. Unfortunately, the RWWs who tried would have been even more of a wipeout. Until the Reps toss Rove & the TPs out, get some sane people in, the results are unlikely to be different. And that is ultimately bad for everyone because without a serious competition the Dems can get just as wacky in the other direction. The middle of the bell curve on the political spectrum has almost no good options on who to vote for. Originally Posted by Old-T

The Demagogueocrats have the left side of the bell curve votes locked in. Exploiting stupidity is standard operating procedure for the left. The Demagogueocrats tell us we don't have a spending problem and the low information voters actually believe it.