Review: Luckiilove21 - broken appointment

Nope. Read the sticky thread at the top of the Indy review forum labeled "Read before posting a NC/NS"

Ummm....this should be in the review section or men's lounge... Originally Posted by grassy_knoll

Thank you THATDUDE! You are right! They way lickher writes is very condesending and awful. I hope providers take note how badly he tore this provider in question.

And lickher, yes it is true. The guy said she was firm so in HIS mind, that is what she is so YES every persons ideas of "firm" is different. THIS THREAD PROVES IT.

You might want to reconsider your writing style as well. Providers might shy away from you for fear of getting a public tear down like you did this chick. If you feel its okay to do it to this chick, what makes a provider think you wouldn't do it to her?

Nice way to tear a lady confidence. Give yourself a pat on the back. Btw if you really want to help "hobbyist" you should do a review of her. It's ok to label me a wk although those that know me would be like bullshit
Originally Posted by Thatdude

You obviously didn't ready everything I said, did you? Read my entire post and then say I "ripped" her... " I actually have seen this provider and many others (to compare to). I didn't say I wasn't satisfied with her or that she's not worthy of being seen" is not ripping a provider. I just want some HONESTY on these boards for a change.

Thank you THATDUDE! You are right! They way lickher writes is very condesending and awful. I hope providers take note how badly he tore this provider in question.

And lickher, yes it is true. The guy said she was firm so in HIS mind, that is what she is so YES every persons ideas of "firm" is different. THIS THREAD PROVES IT.

You might want to reconsider your writing style as well. Providers might shy away from you for fear of getting a public tear down like you did this chick. If you feel its okay to do it to this chick, what makes a provider think you wouldn't do it to her? Originally Posted by Kayleehotchick

Thanks for being rude to a hobbyist. Ever think hobbyists may take a pass on you for miss-interpreting another hobbyist's writing? I was just being honest and will continue to be honest. And FYI I never "book" providers using my ECCIE handle, or tell them my ECCIE handle on a visit and never will. For all you know, I may have seen you and maybe more than once...

Go get her dawg

Really? "firm, tight body?" I've seen her, she's chunky with large rather saggy breasts, not at all firm and tight. She's a sweetheart and has a pretty face, but certainly not a firm tight body... Tara Evans IS firm and tight, check her profile for an example... Originally Posted by LickHer

Thank you THATDUDE! You are right! They way lickher writes is very condesending and awful. I hope providers take note how badly he tore this provider in question.


And lickher, yes it is true. The guy said she was firm so in HIS mind, that is what she is so YES every persons ideas of "firm" is different. THIS THREAD PROVES IT.

You might want to reconsider your writing style as well. Providers might shy away from you for fear of getting a public tear down like you did this chick. If you feel its okay to do it to this chick, what makes a provider think you wouldn't do it to her? Originally Posted by Kayleehotchick

Kaylee, I love you...You are truly one of the most sensible and articulate female posters on this board. You are very truthful and always respectful in how you word your commentary and so is LickHer. I think some of LickHer's previous posts may have rubbed you the wrong way, like this one, but I did not take either of his posts as being condescending. Some may feel they are abrasive, I don't. They are his commentary, just like we guys do on any review forum, from his perspective of having seen her. He gives credit to her attitude and service, but he simply questions the reviewer's physical description. LickHer simply is pointing out the 'disparity' and 'inaccuracy' of the physical description in reviews
from his perspective. Upon viewing her showcase pics as compared to yours, you have a tight body body, but she does not. That being said I find her very sexy, like yourself. Reviews are subjective and each reviewer or commentator is entitled to his or her opinion, I just didn't feel his was condescending or even mean-spirited.

I wish her continued success with hobbyist activity. Vey charming and and a great Babe. This was just my first "no-show" with an ECCIE provider, and thought it should be noted. I had seen her several times before, and was very well satisified/ Maybe just an over - reaction from me. Maybe i should not have posted this. I wish her continued business from the ECCIE hobbyist world.. Originally Posted by teachu7019

Yes, you overreacted...This was a NCNS that should not have been written like a review. You didn't pay anything because she NoShowed you. You should have written an actual review, separate from a Co-Ed NCNS thread, about the actual session that took place after the NCNS, and ripped her about the change of rate, especially after NCNS'n you earlier. This post looks like you were just pissed because you stupidly paid her more than she advertises. You should've known what you needed to pay before going in and brought up the fact she wasted your time earlier. You've seen her before and after this NCNS, makes no sense, to me, why you would write this thread...So yes, in my honest opinion, YOU OVERREACTED and did a disservice to someone you liked.


The Passionate ManSlut - Gatekeeper for the Truth, all things Condescending, and all things Kayleehotchick
.

Manslut....you know I love your guts. And yes, this is the beauty of this world is some love me and some hate me. I guess if we all agreed on everything, it would be boring as hell.

You ROCK Manslut!!! ;-)

Lickher, your correct, there might be some guys who wont see me because of my reply to you and that is okay, it probley means we wouldn't get along anyway. Why waste each others time? This is all about having a fun with the person we spent private time. But I have a right to disagree with you and your writing style just like you have a right to disagree with mine. :-)


If they don't like me by my posting style, thats fine, it's called "different strokes for different folks" ;-)

I dislike Lickher very much both under this handle and all the others he has been banned under. His writing style is agressive, insulting, condescending, and that of a hostile, know-at-all narciccistic asshole.

But, in this case, he was correctly pointing out the OP used "a firm, tight body" to describe the lady in question and that those terms simply do not apply to this provider. This is not to say the lady is not attractive or even hot. I would have no problem jumping her bones! Lickher also pointed out, correctly, that it is a disservice to others to describe her as such. I do agree with that and say its even a disservice to the lady.

Anyone looking for a firm, tight body would not get what they are looking for with her.Those seeking a more voluptuous or currvy woman might not see her because the right terms were not used to describe her. No one should rely upon one review to make up their minds but it happens.

It is critical people use fair, but accurate descriptions for everyones sake.

Lickher used the wrong place to start this discussion and stated himself very poorly. But if you actualy look at what he really said, it was not aimed at the provider. It was a complaint about the terms the OP used. This topic would have been far better served in a seperate thread not in one about a NCNS. Hopefully that is where any more comments about descriptions will go.

And Kaylee, only 2 kinds of men would not be happy to see you. Dead or gay. And I am not really sure about the 2ed group.

I dislike Lickher very much both under this handle and all the others he has been banned under. His writing style is agressive, insulting, condescending, and that of a hostile, know-at-all narciccistic asshole.

But, in this case, he was correctly pointing out the OP used "a firm, tight body" to describe the lady in question and that those terms simply do not apply to this provider. This is not to say the lady is not attractive or even hot. I would have no problem jumping her bones! Lickher also pointed out, correctly, that it is a disservice to others to describe her as such. I do agree with that and say its even a disservice to the lady.

Anyone looking for a firm, tight body would not get what they are looking for with her.Those seeking a more voluptuous or currvy woman might not see her because the right terms were not used to describe her. No one should rely upon one review to make up their minds but it happens.

It is critical people use fair, but accurate descriptions for everyones sake.

Lickher used the wrong place to start this discussion and stated himself very poorly. But if you actualy look at what he really said, it was not aimed at the provider. It was a complaint about the terms the OP used. This topic would have been far better served in a seperate thread not in one about a NCNS. Hopefully that is where any more comments about descriptions will go.

And Kaylee, only 2 kinds of men would not be happy to see you. Dead or gay. And I am not really sure about the 2ed group. Originally Posted by OldButStillGoing

Thank you, "Mr. Arrogance!" I don't see how anyone(you) can be so down on someone that they have never met, talked to or are SO uninformed about. I find your posts about me quite humorous as for some reason you actually think you know who I am and wrongly think I've been on here and been banned and multiple times no less. I disagree with a lot of your post (not all) but I'm not going to rag on you or hate you because I don't agree with your OPINIONS. We all have OPINIONS and that's why I'm here, to share OPINIONS and hopefully learn. I respect your opinions and your right to express them in any fashion you choose. It would be nice if you'd learn to respect others as you obviously demand everyone agree with yours...