Clinton (Ignored Terrorism) Bush(Overreacted) Obama??

In Obama's initial public speech on this event (April 15th), he DID NOT use the word terrorism, referring to it as a tragedy....................... ...

After intense criticism, Obama decided to call it an act of terrorism...he made that statement today (April 16th)


Obama's April 15 statement....he never uses the phrase terrorism/terrorist....

http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/15/ob...on-explosions/

so?

regardless what he said or says you go bonkers


whats the over and under on that NOT happening?

I think it's a trend...

In Obama's initial public speech on this event (April 15th) (WHILE THE DUST WAS STILL SETTLING, AND BEFORE THERE WAS ANYTHING BUT SKETCHY REPORTS FROM THE SCENE... CERTAINLY BEFORE HE HAD A CHANCE TO FINISH READING "MY PET GOAT"), he DID NOT use the word terrorism, referring to it as a tragedy....................... ... OF COURSE, IT WAS A TRAGEDY UNTIL YOU STARTED TURNING IT INTO A PUBLIC URINAL

After intense criticism (HORSESHIT, from whom?) Obama decided (AGAIN, HE "DECIDED" TO DO THAT?)to call it an act of terrorism...he made that statement today (April 16th) (BEFORE YOU SAID HE DIDN'T, MAKING YOU A FUCKING LIAR FOR A CHANGE!)


Obama's April 15 statement....he never uses the phrase terrorism/terrorist....

http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/15/ob...on-explosions/ Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Again, you're trying to backpedal out of a lie Whirlytard. You were banging him for not calling it an act of terror after he'd made the statement.

Obviously, you were so lathered up that you haven't paid attention to much of anything other than your favorite political porn sites.

You're going to wear that wrist out jerking off.

In Obama's initial public speech on this event (April 15th), he DID NOT use the word terrorism, referring to it as a tragedy....................... ...

After intense criticism, Obama decided to call it an act of terrorism...he made that statement today (April 16th)


Obama's April 15 statement....he never uses the phrase terrorism/terrorist....

http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/15/ob...on-explosions/ Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You give new meaning to the term Hater...

Nope...my original comment was about Obama's April 14th statement; Team Obama obviously thought the better and now has revised his announcment....revising it to "terrorism" after I posted my comment.

And he will likely call it terrorism because it will turn out to be domestic inspired; NOT Islamic.....if Islam was involved he probably wouldn't apply the term terror............we know that from Fort Hood.

Obama was waiting to see if the Saudi student had anything to do with it..

An over used word by the left.......when you are losing an argument, resort to ad hominem...

You give new meaning to the term Hater... Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You guys are mixing up the definitions of terrorism and tragedy. Terrorism would be Randy4Dicks, WTF, and Timmy Boy Page going into a locker room of a college hockey team and waving their dicks at them. A tragedy would be preventing the hockey team from kicking their ass.

My bet is that the bombings are not for some domestic reason,
they used nails and ball bearings in them to inflict as much
harm on the people in the area as possible. They weren't just
trying to make a statement but kill and injure as many people
as possible.

Could well be a payback attempt for the killing of Bin Laden
or something along those lines.

Whoever it was. their intention was to harm as many Americans
as possible with what capabilities the bombs had.

Probably a smaller terrorist group or an individual, a larger group
would probably hit more than one area, a larger scale attack.

Anyway I would bet it was for some foreign reason, it would
be surprising if a domestic group tried to kill as many people
as possible.

If it does turn out to be Islamic extremism; look to Obama to walkback his "terrorism" label..........

He already did that, fuckball. Maybe he knows who did it and isn't telling Breitbart!

Wow; You are claiming Obama is already walking back his "Boston was act of terrorism" statement?...that was fast....

I think it's a trend... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Whirly is trending bonkers.....

An over used word by the left.......when you are losing an argument, resort to ad hominem... Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Sorry,stupid SOB feel better?

And he didn't revise anything. But he did call,it an act of terror more than an hour before your post bitching about it this morning, Whirlytard

Lies upon lies, believed by fools.