reviews of reviews

I don't know, but I do know the comments are the reason I no longer refer guys to this site. If my clients wanted to be talked down to about how dumb they are and how they never do anything right, they could just sit down on the couch next to their wife. Originally Posted by Brooke Wild
Why not take the time to show the guy the thread that shows examples of reviews? Why just say the guys here suck don't go to that site? I don't think that's fair to us or that guy. You've only provided half of what he needs to know, yet we get the blame not to cool babe. Originally Posted by trey
I think she was speaking more about the assholes here, not the ones that act like they have some sense sometimes. You know who they are, and you know what they do.
Yeah...we know how you feel about Houston men...

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=109
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=761852&postcount=8
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=823401&postcount=5 Originally Posted by Wakeuр
^^^^

Good research... Originally Posted by 08cris
That ain't no damn research, because he was there! At one point on the Houston forums things got very ugly, so much so that a lot of Houston provider STOPPED posting at all, except for ads. Now most providers know not to pay him any mind because his reputation as a hater and a miscreant proceeds him now (yes, muthafucka I called you a miscreant LOL), back then we only had 3 or 4 mods and this forum that we now for the most part police ourselves was still forming. Perhaps you should go back and read to get better reference (and context, which means something) and guess WHO was right in the middle, stirring up A LOT of shit. Just take a guess..


Don't be a lemming.
Wakeup's Avatar
At one point on the Houston forums things got very ugly, so much so that a lot of Houston provider STOPPED posting at all, except for ads. Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
List names or GTFO...
[QUOTE=Luxury Daphne;1053009909]That ain't no damn research, because he was there! At one point on the Houston forums things got very ugly, so much so that a lot of Houston provider STOPPED posting at all, except for ads. Now most providers know not to pay him any mind because his reputation as a hater and a miscreant proceeds him now (yes, muthafucka I called you a miscreant LOL), back then we only had 3 or 4 mods and this forum that we now for the most part police ourselves was still forming. Perhaps you should go back and read to get better reference (and context, which means something) and guess WHO was right in the middle, stirring up A LOT of shit. Just take a guess..


Don't be a lemming.[/QUOTE)

No,no ... Follow his lead and your tagline could read: "God's gift to men who Have to pay women for sex" ... Just image the glory
(I did a search to see if this question had been asked before)

I've noticed this ever since ECCIE started up and before that with one predecessor, ASPD.

curiously why are reviews or at least comments about another hobbyist's review of a provider being offered? (besides those of occasional suspicious ones)

what's to gain from this? Originally Posted by Solarsystem
Grasshopper:

The question you should ask is why shouldn't hobbyists comment on reviews? To answer that you must also answer why Facebook? Why twit er tweet? Why do people converge into electronic communities?

When you can snatch the provider out from under me, you will have the answer to your question.

Judge
List names or GTFO... Originally Posted by Wakeuр
carry your own water.. Pfft. Besides, I am done with lists LOL. Anyone with eyes who look back at threads from that era and compared to a year after, and to now, can see the difference. And alot of those hooktards are still around..
boardman's Avatar
Grasshopper:

The question you should ask is why shouldn't hobbyists comment on reviews? To answer that you must also answer why Facebook? Why twit er tweet? Why do people converge into electronic communities?

When you can snatch the provider out from under me, you will have the answer to your question.

Judge Originally Posted by TheJudge69
Dr. Alfred Lanning: [voiceover] There have always been ghosts in the machine. Random segments of code, that have grouped together to form unexpected protocols. Unanticipated, these free radicals engender questions of free will, creativity, and even the nature of what we might call the soul. Why is it that when some robots are left in darkness, they will seek out the light? Why is it that when robots are stored in an empty space, they will group together, rather than stand alone? How do we explain this behavior? Random segments of code? Or is it something more? When does a perceptual schematic become consciousness? When does a difference engine become the search for truth? When does a personality simulation become the bitter mote... of a soul?

Binary code Philosophy anyone?
blowpop's Avatar
Why not take the time to show the guy the thread that shows examples of reviews? Why just say the guys here suck don't go to that site? I don't think that's fair to us or that guy. You've only provided half of what he needs to know, yet we get the blame not to cool babe. Originally Posted by trey
Trey, the hostile atmosphere that's been created by the Bad Attitude Brigade has consequences. I've heard from both hobbyists and providers that they now stay away from Eccie. Many people don't have thick enough skin to endure the offensive remarks that spew forth on a regular basis.

I wonder how many worthwhile reviews we missed out on because some keyboard cowboy attacked a newbie reviewer? Or how many providers have been driven off by the "whale" crap and other misogyny that's tolerated here?

I think there's still valuable information here, but I understand why you'd not send a hobby contact to Eccie. I certainly don't mention it to anyone who doesn't know about it.
Wakeup's Avatar
Trey, the hostile atmosphere that's been created by the Bad Attitude Brigade has consequences. I've heard from both hobbyists and providers that they now stay away from Eccie. Originally Posted by blowpop
Once more...for the cheap seats...

List names or GTFO...
boardman's Avatar
And we have finally come full circle. I wonder where this thread will lead to next.
willdooit's Avatar
Comedy
Sarunga's Avatar
Yeah...we know how you feel about Houston men...

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=109
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=761852&postcount=8
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=823401&postcount=5 Originally Posted by Wakeuр
At one point on the Houston forums things got very ugly, so much so that a lot of Houston provider STOPPED posting at all, except for ads. Now most providers know not to pay him any mind because his reputation as a hater and a miscreant proceeds him now (yes, muthafucka I called you a miscreant LOL), back then we only had 3 or 4 mods and this forum that we now for the most part police ourselves was still forming. ....guess WHO was right in the middle, stirring up A LOT of shit. Just take a guess... Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne


Please bring my bullshit here. If I want to follow certain guys around here like a shrimp after fish shit, I'll do it here. Thank me. Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne




Solar, the back and forth can occasionally be valuable. Useful information can be added, requests for more information can be made.

It also gives our more special members a chance to respond with witticisms like "heh", "she's fat" and pictures of superheroes.

So everyone wins. Originally Posted by blowpop
"heh" "yeah, what he said" "fight club"
the back and forth banter is both useful and annoying.

Once a review is posted, there should be some limit as to how many days one is allowed to post comments on it.. say.. 5 days? 7?

After that it is locked.

How many times do we see comments on a review (or thread) that is over 30 days?

There should be a limit as to how long the review is open for discussion 7 days should be ideal.....

Thoughts?
the back and forth banter is both useful and annoying.

Once a review is posted, there should be some limit as to how many days one is allowed to post comments on it.. say.. 5 days? 7?

After that it is locked.

How many times do we see comments on a review (or thread) that is over 30 days?

There should be a limit as to how long the review is open for discussion 7 days should be ideal.....

Thoughts? Originally Posted by Spirit13
"heh" "yeah, what he said" "fight club"