I recently commented on a thread in Houston that discussed the value vs provider conundrum. (I cannot find the link, but if you sift through the name calling you can find some very interesting points brought on by contributors). I think it is important to remember that arguing the "value" of anything is 100% an argument of opinion. Not fact. It is my
opinion that value should be placed on an experience as opposed to an activity and a
fact that those who agree will gravitate toward ladies of the same interest. I don't know what Joe Blow wants from Polly Provider - all I know is what my own experiences dictate. We can argue until the moon turns blue on what our fellow brethren prefer, but we would be only be making educated guesses.
Another thought to consider is the percentage of community members that post (whether male or female) versus those that don't. I would guess that the latter comprises a larger sector. So who
REALLY knows what anyone wants. Mel Gibson didn't know what women wanted and I certainly have no idea how to crack the code of the male psyche. But that doesn't mean I won't try
PleasantSurprise, I think you may have misunderstood my brief lecture as a defensive outburst. That certainly was not my intention. I just thought the Whiskey man had misread my initial post and brought it upon myself to elaborate. I am prone to prolific responses and verbal rambling from time to time. IE this