Does this turn you on?

umm why did I get points for a picture I pointed out to you guys? That was a screenshot I took of the friend finder ad on the border for my screen. If it violates image guidelines, perhaps you should have a talk with them! I was wondering why everytime I log in there is some random chick in the AFF ads frigging herself... Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

It is crazy as hell that you got points for that! I have all those things minimized so I can't see any of them ... ever.

It is crazy as hell that you got points for that! I have all those things minimized so I can't see any of them ... ever. Originally Posted by Brooke Wilde

I run in mobile so I don't see that or the full page annoying signatures.

I understand it's a screen shot of our sponsor Daphne so to leave that infraction wouldn't be right therefore it's reversed. My apologies for the tardiness on removing it I've actually been away from the keyboard to answer real world happenings.

Also I've done a bit a research here......I'll give you the difference of the image using between our sponsor ad's and showcases/provider ad's. The sponsor ad's are using these images to sell porn while which is perfectly legal. Using these sort of images in provider ad's and showcases would be using it to sell ass which is illegal.

Mojojo's apology is highly commendable, even for the secondary reaction.

Now, if it was indeed a mistake to remove the graphic Daphne posted, how about putting it back....so that we could continue with the intellectual discussion as to the efficacy of it?

What's crazy is the sponsors can show porn directly and sell porn openly but members can't even post a link to a porn video.

Poppy not exactly...



Sarunga the image was an attachment so ill wait for LD to send it back so that I can put it back on.

What's crazy is the sponsors can show porn directly and sell porn openly but members can't even post a link to a porn video. Originally Posted by poppy71

Key word being sponsor.

If members wanted to pay to post porn links we might could accommodate them ( My opinion only. Not an official stance)

Thanks mojo.

I understand it's a screen shot of our sponsor Daphne so to leave that infraction wouldn't be right therefore it's reversed. My apologies for the tardiness on removing it I've actually been away from the keyboard to answer real world happenings.

Also I've done a bit a research here......I'll give you the difference of the image using between our sponsor ad's and showcases/provider ad's. The sponsor ad's are using these images to sell porn while which is perfectly legal. Using these sort of images in provider ad's and showcases would be using it to sell ass which is illegal. Originally Posted by Mojojo

Selling ass is illegal? They hell you say. Now what's this board all about? Of yeah I almost forgot it's just a SHMB.

You guys might want to actually think before you post...


#12 - Respect the posted "Image Standards" which apply to our public coed forums. (including Showcase) In short, images which depict subjects which are topless are allowed, but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)

Where does it say anything about a difference between pornography being legal and prostitution being illegal? It says exposed genitalia or pornography isn't to be shown in public forums. That's it.

Under the rule, it's perfectly okay to say that the ads are not pictures posted in public coed forums and hence aren't covered by then rule. However, once a member posts the picture of that ad in a public coed forum, it becomes a violation. There's no room for interpretation in the rule as written, no matter what you may think. If you don't want to give points because its a picture from your own ad section, that's fine, your call, but the image is still in violation of the forum guidelines...

Heh

I've heard of dumbing it down but very rarely have I seen anyone dumb it up.

I should buy a lottery ticket today.
mojo I couldn't pm it to you, I guess you can't pm attachments? too lazy for photobucket right now. this is the pic in question.

on a side note, we have got to find 3 sides another avatar. sheesh.

aff.png

You guys might want to actually think before you post...


#12 - Respect the posted "Image Standards" which apply to our public coed forums. (including Showcase) In short, images which depict subjects which are topless are allowed, but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)

Where does it say anything about a difference between pornography being legal and prostitution being illegal? It says exposed genitalia or pornography isn't to be shown in public forums. That's it.

Under the rule, it's perfectly okay to say that the ads are not pictures posted in public coed forums and hence aren't covered by then rule. However, once a member posts the picture of that ad in a public coed forum, it becomes a violation. There's no room for interpretation in the rule as written, no matter what you may think. If you don't want to give points because its a picture from your own ad section, that's fine, your call, but the image is still in violation of the forum guidelines... Originally Posted by Wakeuр

A few points of order.

The English languuge is a mother fucker.

It's not a rule it's a guideline. Look it up they don't have the same meaning.

"are to be avoided". That's a grey statement. If it was written 'are not to be permitted" as it is for porn links it would be different.

The bottom line is really about the bottom line. Members aren't supposed to post porn or links to it to protect the boards business of selling advertising space to porn sites.

Thanks mojojo for clearing that up...works for me.

Thanks Mojojo for reversing her points. I have seen the same photo and similar nude photos, popup on the side. I didn't understand why she got points for taking a screen shot and posting it.