Can you hear me now?

Wow, even by the very low standards of this forum, THIS is a patheticly bad thread.

Wow, even by the very low standards of this forum, THIS is a patheticly bad thread. Originally Posted by Old-T

Lama has no standards!

Links? Or are you just busy throwing out "dumbass" dumbass?

Here's my link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack

It talks about precursors. Usually precursors need to be put together in a lab. So where are the labs you mentioned? Originally Posted by gnadfly

This shows we pick and choose.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/natio...attacks/68698/

What I do not understand is how some of you support the invasion of Iraq yet not Syria? Makes no fucking sense. Iraq wasn't going to invade the US. Nor is Syria.

This shows we pick and choose.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/natio...attacks/68698/

What I do not understand is how some of you support the invasion of Iraq yet not Syria? Makes no fucking sense. Iraq wasn't going to invade the US. Nor is Syria. Originally Posted by WTF

Let me know when Kuwait is invaded by Syria. Or when Syria accidentally attacks some of our military assets. Or when Syria is sitting over a small sea of petroleum. Or when Syria tries to assassinate a US President. Better yet, do some research and put forward the list of UN resolutions Syria broken in the last 5 years.

You want an "apples to apples" comparison when none exists in order to justify your hypocrisy.

The point is President Obama has months to form a coalition after he drew a red line. He couldn't. It was after the second attack that his administration acknowledged that he threatened action again. He failed. Kerry and Barry couldn't keep their story straight.

The only person happy that we aren't bombing brown people is you. I'm sure there's a small war somewhere that Obama can't fuck up.

Putin/Rodham 2016!

Turdfly's confusion stems from "never" having a clue. Originally Posted by bigtex

And what is your "clue" ....

Are there WMD's in Syria NOW or not?

"Yes" or "No"......

Why is it, BT, that you KNEW there were NO WMD's in IRAQ before the 2003 invasion,


.. but you don't know if there are any in Syria before the 2013 MISSILE LAUNCH?

Why is that BT?

Is it because Obminable said there ARE IN SYRIA?

Or is because Bush said there ARE IN IRAQ?

Or is because BT was blowing shit out of this mouth both times?

You damn right Obaminable and CARRIE want the Russies to get the WMDs!!!!

Let me know when Kuwait is invaded by Syria. Or when Syria accidentally attacks some of our military assets. ! Originally Posted by gnadfly

Let me know when memo's are leaked saying that Obama gave Syria intelligence on where the rebels where to deploy the nerve gas on their ass.

That is wtf Ronnie R did for Iraq. Can't say as I blame him. Ole Ronnie was shipping arms to Iran on the sly and de facto gassing their troops!


The U.S. knew about, and in one case helped, Iraq's chemical weapons attacks against Iran in the 1980's, according to recently declassified CIA documents obtained by Foreign Policy. Their detailed timeline, also constructed with the aid of interviews with former foreign intelligence officials, indicates that the U.S. secretly had evidence of Iraqi chemical attacks in 1983. The evidence, FP writes, is "tantamount to an official American admission of complicity in some of the most gruesome chemical weapons attacks ever launched

Let me know when memo's are leaked saying that Obama gave Syria intelligence on where the rebels where to deploy the nerve gas on their ass.

That is wtf Ronnie R did for Iraq.


The U.S. knew about, and in one case helped, Iraq's chemical weapons attacks against Iran in the 1980's, according to recently declassified CIA documents obtained by Foreign Policy. Their detailed timeline, also constructed with the aid of interviews with former foreign intelligence officials, indicates that the U.S. secretly had evidence of Iraqi chemical attacks in 1983. The evidence, FP writes, is "tantamount to an official American admission of complicity in some of the most gruesome chemical weapons attacks ever launched Originally Posted by WTF

Think of it as Ronnie's way of getting even with Iran for Beirut.

So how did he obtain the gases that were used on the Kurds? Originally Posted by gnadfly

From Syria

Think of it as Ronnie's way of getting even with Iran for Beirut. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Ronnie let'em kill each other, Obama needs to learn that lesson.

Ronnie let'em kill each other, Obama needs to learn that lesson. Originally Posted by WTF

+1

+1 Originally Posted by I B Hankering

No , +1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 ,000,000,000, LOL

Ronnie didnt know his own name after the first 100 days of his second term.

and yes, this is an incredibly stupid thread...even for this asylum.

stupid isn't the word ...

these morons yammer " kill all the muzzies" on a constant basis ... when some muzzies get killed they bitch about it, regardless who kills them ..

retarded fuckers.

CJ....why do you force me to point out the obvious to you? Chemical weapons have a shelf life but the precursors for chemical weapons last much longer. Plus once you have the techology setting in front of you it is easier to duplicate.

I do like the fact that you are subconsciously admitting that Iraq did have WMDs.

Im sure you find pleasure in a stiff breeze and a carton of raw liver, JDIdiot!