Starbuck's Gun Policy

Why they would rather not have guns in stores.........Dallas Walmart 2012....I don't have a problem with CHLs......I have one. Some people shouldn't.

The incident happened around 9:25 p.m. when Canady reached into his pocket to get his wallet while standing in line to buy milk at the cash register.

Schinto said next thing she knows, she heard a loud pop, saw smoke, then felt a burning sensation in her right foot. She said shell casings from the bullet had struck her foot. She said the debris from the bullet hitting the cement floor, then hit her daughter's ankle, causing it to bleed.
Canady, who Dallas police said has a Concealed Handgun License, accidentally pulled the trigger of his Springfield .40-caliber semi-automatic pistol. It was holstered inside his pants, a sergeant told News 8.

The mother told News 8 she also saw the debris strike a five-year-old boy in the face. Police say he and his family are not pressing charges. Schinto said she is pressing charges.

A CHL must intentionally display weapon in Texas to be charged.

PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE
HOLDER. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license
holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person
under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code,
and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun.

Things can go to hell in a hand basket rapidly if the store calls the police.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010...ted-gun-didnt/

.40 Springfield

"There are also a number of passive safeties that make accidental discharges a thing of the past. Both a grip safety and a trigger safety necessitate a firing grip on the pistol. Additionally, there is a drop safety that prevents discharges that would result from a significant impact as well as an out-of-battery safety that prevents firing unless the slide is completely in battery. I am not sure if a pistol even exists that is safer than the XD."

any pistol is safe, its the idiot behind it that's dangerous

I can see that you are still desperately insecure about your intellectual inferiority and need to beat back those fears by fantasizing about what you imagine is your superior breadth of knowledge about various topics. If you had read the linked article, and had the mental capacity to retain any of it, you would have seen that open carry was a topic of discussion in the article. Hence, my comments.

Regarding state law, I'm well aware that a privately owned business can request that CHL holders not carry on their property. Called a 30.06 sign in Texas. Believe it or not, it's another topic that I know more about than you do.....dumbass.

Timmie the OP was about CCW carriers and you're going on about open carry. Open carry is legal in many states though many of the police don't take kindly to it. Back to the OP, if you are carrying concealed how do they know? If you're doing it right. How many molesters frequent Starbucks? Should they have to out themselves in some way since no one wants to be around them? The whole point (that Timmie missed) is that as a private business Starbucks has a right to post a sign that says don't carry in this building but depending on the state it may or may not have any legal force. Starbucks has not done that. He has not said that you CAN'T carry, he just prefers that you don't. Okay, I've heard your plea and my rights are more important to me than your fears. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

1911 platform in the hands of a properly trained shooter is the safest gun on the planet. And, unfortunately, there is no technology available that makes accidental discharges a thing of the past. But, I agree....Springfield is a fine weapons system and quite safe when handled properly. But, that's true of all weapons. People are stupid. They don't handle weapons safely.

.40 Springfield

"There are also a number of passive safeties that make accidental discharges a thing of the past. Both a grip safety and a trigger safety necessitate a firing grip on the pistol. Additionally, there is a drop safety that prevents discharges that would result from a significant impact as well as an out-of-battery safety that prevents firing unless the slide is completely in battery. I am not sure if a pistol even exists that is safer than the XD." Originally Posted by LexusLover

Starbucks is a private company. If they don't want guns on their property, it's their prerogative. If you don't like the rule, go somewhere else. I don't see why this is a problem.

Starbucks is a private company. If they don't want guns on their property, it's their prerogative. If you don't like the rule, go somewhere else. I don't see why this is a problem. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Typical liberal response.It is every ones god given right to pack were ever they please.

YO! TIMMEEEEE. In Missouri and Kansas that sign has to meet certain legal requirements or it is invalid. Obey the law boy!

....Springfield is a fine weapons system and quite safe when handled properly. Originally Posted by timpage

That was my point, ...

..... and has been in just about every thread in which CC is discussed.

It is every ones god given right to pack were ever they please. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Go out to the local airport and try to get onto a commercial flight with a gun. I'm sure the TSA officials will be very sympathetic to your God-given rights.

YO! TIMMEEEEE. In Missouri and Kansas that sign has to meet certain legal requirements or it is invalid. Obey the law boy! Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Same rule applies in Texas.

The sign read: "We appreciate your business, but please leave your gun and ski mask in your car." Midway, TX.

Go out to the local airport and try to get onto a commercial flight with a gun. I'm sure the TSA officials will be very sympathetic to your God-given rights. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Don't go off the deep end read the comment who it was addressed to take with grain of salt.

Don't go off the deep end read the comment who it was addressed to take with grain of salt. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

I apologize if I misread the intent of your comment. It's early in the morning.
After re-reading your comment, it probably should have been directed at certain others.

.. and if one doesn't leave after being instructed to leave .. it's trespassing. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Where Iam from the charge would be " Remaining On Premises After Being Forbidden" Trespassing pertains to private property or areas of restriction that are posted, in Louisiana anyway.