He-said/She-said Perspective Project

Umm not gonna be public ? Just for your personal viewing ?
This just got creepy as hell !

...Just to be clear; I'm not suggesting the film be made public--just a record with which to compare. I would watch the video and transcribe what happened play-by-play. Originally Posted by 3daygetaway

Dirty old man

IB

Not trying to hi-jack your topic but maybe an alternative. While not for the boards it could be interesting to stage this at a M&G (providing folks have the guts). Obviously this is absurd, but what the hell. If nothing else members could re-direct their frustrations by coming up with more questions for a round 2 , 3, etc. We just don't name names or direct references to others. Winners get a round of drinks.

It's the New Provider Game!

We have 3 new providers that are coupled with their first vouch.
They get points for matching answers like:

Round One

Him -

When she first opened the door you:

1. Wanted to run
2. Felt your jaw dropping
3. Felt your pecker dropping
4. Wished you had brought Febreeze
5. Wished you had booked more time
6. Asked for a shower

Her -

When you first opened the door you:

1. Wished you hadn't given a review discount
2. Wanted to run
3. Asked to see their AARP card
4. Felt your crotch dampen
5. Wish he had booked more time
6. Requested he take a shower

i hear the camera adds 10lbs.
my dick would be HUGE!!!!! Originally Posted by knotty man

..that too my ass is big enough lol

You're kidding, right?
If A=B, and B=C, A does not necessarily equal C! Originally Posted by 3daygetaway

Actually, according to the Transitive Property, A DOES necessarily equal C, if A=B and B=C.

This is TFF! This should help with the research...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2y_-vsHvPBE

Actually, according to the Transitive Property, A DOES necessarily equal C, if A=B and B=C. Originally Posted by Magnetron

THX, I just fell off my chair as Newton just got undone, then started redoing the entire E=mc**2 equation.

3D-G: Don't go into math, stay in films, you got a lot to learn there first...

I need to take these threads less seriously ....

I'm looking for a provider and a hobbyist for a sociological experiment: Our interpretations of encounters are vastly different, to the extent that if a provider were to read a review by a hobbyist, she might not recognize anything from their encounter but her name!

I want to follow the contacts between the two, ride along with the hobbyist, video record the encounter (as a non-participant), and then have all three of us write a review of the experience as best we can recall, then test our memories against the footage.

I think it will be really interesting to see how the different parties interpreted the event, and fodder for some interesting conversation on the board (thus posting in Co-ed instead of ISO). The point really is to admit that our memories are fallible and appreciate that our perspectives can be very different and yet both positive.
Originally Posted by 3daygetaway

Hey I can save you a bunch of time. I will make it quite simple. Let's start with point our interpretations are vastly different.

This is obvious, everyone has a different perspective on any singular event. This is due to heuristics. Everyone has different life experiences and then judges/problems solves on their stereotypical answers of those life experiences.
SIMPLE EXAMPLE. Provider is gorgeous but the first thing she does is fart loudly. Joe Blow's life experience is farters are usually uncouth, unkempt people thus already his initial impression is colored a certain way.

The provider thinks Hey I had to fart everyone does it, culturally it is no big deal for me, it shouldn't be a big deal for him.

Okay so test our memories against the footage, our interpretations of the event can change and even with the questions asked. This is called priming. The way a question was asked can color the event.
Example. For this fantasy video when you all got really hot and heavy how did it make you feel about blah blah blah.
Well now you primed a certain section of the video for the expectation that their interpretation about the event should be it was hot and heavy even if it wasn't.

This can actually change their own recollection and compromise what they believe. They could now rationalize and say yeah I guess it was hot and heavy when before they did not believe it was.

Memory recollection IS fallible. WE have to encode this and this process is sensitive to stressful conditions. (Such as a nervous first encounter)
Then store it, yet again many variables can affect proper storage of memories and accuracy stuff like abundance of glial cells in an individual.

Then finally retrieving the memory. Which is done by certain cues and stimuli. WE DO NOT RECORD MEMORY LIKE A VIDEOTAPE.
We can actually imprint false memories into a person by retelling a fictitious event enough times.

So yeah, look now you don't have to do this I already have your conclusion.
Plus seriously a person would have to be a bit....well.... documenting every facet of a fantasy encounter for a stranger to then just have some message board discussion is a bit crazy.
The risks FAR outweigh any possible reward.