Generosa (Just a passing thought)

Need to make sure your boss/girl know this clearly. Unless attacked first I am ok. But when attacked I defend myself. Originally Posted by bladtinzu

St. C is my boss here. I'm pretty sure he is not a girl.

Huck

St. C is my boss here. I'm pretty sure he is not a girl.

Huck Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

Sure...

It seems to me that at the heart of the matter is the fact that Generosa has taken herself off the open market and is apparently only seeing guys under certain circumstances, like the rent is due and such. And as she is not an "active" provider she has chosen to only do doubles, probably so she doesn't have to do any screening herself.

As Trinity put so eloquently:

Fuck you, I don't have to fuck you, so fuck off, you're fired!! Lmao falls under the same category really. Originally Posted by Trinity Kane

So what is the issue, the fact that the thread was closed? Well staff doesn't like closing threads, and it should be avoided when possible, however, this thread did meet the requirements for the op to request it to be closed. It was open for less than 4 hours, it was not a controversial subject (which is the reason most request to close are rejected), the only area that it did not directly meet was the number of responses. On that point, almost every post beyond the original was someone asking the same question hoping for a different answer.

So, why all the drama? I understand that you didn't get an answer on whether she would consider being a sugar baby, but, as she is only seeing people when she needs money, that sort of rules her out as being an effective SB. I mean I would hate to make an investment into that sort of relationship only to call her and find out that no, she doesn't really "need" to see me right now,, that sort of defeats the reason for having a sugar baby doesn't it?

Thank you Lazr, for both your impartial take on this situation, and for standing behind Huck's decision to close the original thread.

It's clear to me that certain individuals simply enjoy being combative...and routinely hone in on any opportunity to do so.

The board owners do not like staff to close threads, and in almost 80% of the request we don't do it. Usually because it is someone just trying to avoid fallout for some ill advised post. That was not the case with the original thread but some questions did apparently remain unanswered so hopefully we can deal with them here.

I offered my assumption for Generosa's reasons for how she is handling her business and why considering her for a sugar baby is self defeating, I am sure if she wanted a Sugar Daddy she would have no problem filling the position. In the end, she has the right to "hobby" how and when she feels like it, and that is the bottom line.

The board owners do not like staff to close threads, and in almost 80% of the request we don't do it. Usually because it is someone just trying to avoid fallout for some ill advised post. That was not the case with the original thread but some questions did apparently remain unanswered so hopefully we can deal with them here. Originally Posted by Lazrback

I personally won't be dealing with any more silly questions pertaining to Generosa's availability. I've clearly stated the circumstances under which she's available numerous times, and there's really nothing else to say.

I offered my assumption for Generosa's reasons for how she is handling her business and why considering her for a sugar baby is self defeating... Originally Posted by Lazrback

Your assumptions are dead on.

...In the end, she has the right to "hobby" how and when she feels like it, and that is the bottom line. Originally Posted by Lazrback

+1!

It seems to me that at the heart of the matter is the fact that Generosa has taken herself off the open market and is apparently only seeing guys under certain circumstances, like the rent is due and such. And as she is not an "active" provider she has chosen to only do doubles, probably so she doesn't have to do any screening herself.

As Trinity put so eloquently:



So what is the issue, the fact that the thread was closed? Well staff doesn't like closing threads, and it should be avoided when possible, however, this thread did meet the requirements for the op to request it to be closed. It was open for less than 4 hours, it was not a controversial subject (which is the reason most request to close are rejected), the only area that it did not directly meet was the number of responses. On that point, almost every post beyond the original was someone asking the same question hoping for a different answer.Yet this so called mod in question is pretty much owned by the hooker in question. Which I do believe is a conflict of interest first off is it not? Seems to be the popular consensus among other mods here. Add to it the name calling and other infractions done in this thread by said hooker with no mod backlash it seems to be utterly true said hooker owns said mod does it not? But the hilarious thing is said hooker can dish it out but when it is thrown back in her wretched little face she goes running to have a thread locked. Two can play at that game but I am above doing that.

So, why all the drama? I understand that you didn't get an answer on whether she would consider being a sugar baby, but, as she is only seeing people when she needs money, that sort of rules her out as being an effective SB. I mean I would hate to make an investment into that sort of relationship only to call her and find out that no, she doesn't really "need" to see me right now,, that sort of defeats the reason for having a sugar baby doesn't it? Originally Posted by Lazrback

Due to some hooker starting the drama which seems to be her modus operandi on the boards. Besides putting said hooker nose into business she has no business getting into in the first place. Then who can forget the illustrious stories she puts here like another chick stealing money from her, issues with another mod she did not like due to him replacing her "boy", the list is long. Longer than her so called review list.

As for me being nice. I started out asking a simple question and ended up being attacked out of the blue by some hooker for asking said simple question. If someone starts it I tend to finish it. Which happened here. I did not provoke such a slanderous response yet sure got one. And of course nothing will be done about that seeing she has her as she puts it "boy" in a position to look out for her.

Seems she needs it..

Is Blad getting worked up because Ginger may have a modtard in her pocket..........and he is jealous?

Is Blad getting worked up because Ginger may be preventing him from seeing a hooktard........and he is pissed?

Is Blad getting worked up because a modtard locked a thread at the OPs request.......and he feels muted?

Why is he picking this situation to fight this fight?

Lazr's explanation is not unreasonable.

There are plenty off real opportunities to bitch and moan over moderators locking threads inappropriately........just wait for that time and have at it.

Is Blad getting worked up because Ginger may have a modtard in her pocket..........and he is jealous?Nope as we all have known this. Just proven beyond a shadow of a doubt now.

Is Blad getting worked up because Ginger may be preventing him from seeing a hooktard........and he is pissed?Nope. See plenty as is. Way out of her league at that.

Is Blad getting worked up because a modtard locked a thread at the OPs request.......and he feels muted?50/50 on that

Why is he picking this situation to fight this fight?Just proving a point. Which is now well proven

Lazr's explanation is not unreasonable.

There are plenty off real opportunities to bitch and moan over moderators locking threads inappropriately........just wait for that time and have at it. Originally Posted by dearhunter

With that being said.. Wonder why this one hasn't been locked since I have been so bad?? Oh wait I know why..

Is Blad getting worked up because Ginger may have a modtard in her pocket..........and he is jealous? Originally Posted by dearhunter

For the official record, no modtard is in my pocket. Huck saw things from my perspective. Lazr did, too. If the mod in my pocket conspiracy theory is correct, I must have a pretty big pocket. Seems like there's a party going on in there!

Is Blad getting worked up because Ginger may be preventing him from seeing a hooktard........and he is pissed? Originally Posted by dearhunter

No, Blad just takes any and all opportunities to be a combative "verified asshole." His words, not mine. He's proud of it.

Is Blad getting worked up because a modtard locked a thread at the OPs request.......and he feels muted?

Why is he picking this situation to fight this fight?

Lazr's explanation is not unreasonable... Originally Posted by dearhunter

Blad's pissed off that he was recently banned and he's merely trying to take it out on those he deems responsible.

If he wants to assign responsibility, he should start with the big mouth staring back at him in the mirror.

With that being said.. Wonder why this one hasn't been locked since I have been so bad?? Oh wait I know why.. Originally Posted by bladtinzu

Hey Blad, it hasn't been locked because this one is YOUR thread, and you haven't asked for it to be locked. However, I will be glad to lock it if you ask. Does that make me your "boy"?

Huck

Hey Blad, it hasn't been locked because this one is YOUR thread, and you haven't asked for it to be locked. However, I will be glad to lock it if you ask. Does that make me your "boy"?

Huck Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

Nor will I ask..

I don't back down when things don't go my way a run asking someone to lock a thread because it may or may not make me look bad.

Doing that speaks volumes of the one asking it to be locked lack of intestinal fortitude now doesn't it?

As for you being "my boy".. Seems your already owned by a certain hooker so no room for me in that one.

Blad's pissed off that he was recently banned and he's merely trying to take it out on those he deems responsible.

If he wants to assign responsibility, he should start with the big mouth staring back at him in the mirror. Originally Posted by Ginger Doll

Never said it was anyone's fault but mine. Nor blamed anyone. If I did please provide said proof.

If not I suggest trying to quit placing the blame fault where it isn't in order to muddle the process and try and protect your "boy"..

However, I will be glad to lock it if you ask. Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

Careful...

Actually , Lazerbacks view, while it does have some merit , is not actually impartial as Ginger stated.
The fact that he felt to denegrate Blad by posting a "fuck you " quote proves to a large extent his disdain for the topic at hand and is his personal opinion. So...... impartial.... nope.......