Since the review is open to viewing, the question remains about fake pics which violate ECCIE policy! Originally Posted by LouigiWhere is everyone getting this FAKE PICTURE thing from???
I also wonder how using another person's pictures this is not a violation of the following:There it is in black and white. I have never met Cara, from all the reviews she comes across as a sweetheart. That said , why does she get away with admittedly using photos that are not her but are of a simular likeness ?
#26 - False advertising will not be permitted on ECCIE. If you utilize our forums, Showcase, or other advertising features, we ask that your tactics are straight-forward and accurate. If you choose to use images in your advertising, we require that the subject of the images are in fact you. Cases of alleged "false advertising" whether it be through inaccurate images or with text, should be reported to staff by the members using the RTM function. Investigation and appropriate actions will be taken, which may include removal of the false material and could possibly result in loss of ad-posting privileges. Originally Posted by JDog75
Oh they aren't "fake" they are real photos but they just aren't of her. Got it?? Originally Posted by canyonman
I also wonder how using another person's pictures this is not a violation of the following:Great Job! I'm quoting you in case Canyon has you on ignore. It's always amazing how some peoples feelings get in the way of common sense.
#26 - False advertising will not be permitted on ECCIE. If you utilize our forums, Showcase, or other advertising features, we ask that your tactics are straight-forward and accurate. If you choose to use images in your advertising, we require that the subject of the images are in fact you. Cases of alleged "false advertising" whether it be through inaccurate images or with text, should be reported to staff by the members using the RTM function. Investigation and appropriate actions will be taken, which may include removal of the false material and could possibly result in loss of ad-posting privileges. Originally Posted by JDog75
Oh I got it all right. But like usual you don't get it! Why is there all this discussion of ROS material? shouldn't the MODS be editing that ASAP!? I know if it was "your" ROS Intel I bet you might want it removed... YES?Sure I wouldnt be happy SL. The reviewer was at fault for not putting the ros content in the correct area ...I know you realize that too...Unfortunately mods have jobs and have a life outside of eccie unlike yourself and whispers that are able to camp out all day and night on eccie...
Originally Posted by Still Looking
Sure I wouldnt be happy SL. The reviewer was at fault for not putting the ros content in the area ...I know you realize that too...Unfortunately mods have jobs and have a life outside of eccie unlike yourself and whispers that are able to camp out all day and night on eccie...Your still NOT getting it Canyon. WHY are board members talking about ROS information in a thread when like yourself YOU know its ROS information. And yes we all have lives and we ALL make mistakes. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.
This reviewer, not a newbie at that screwed up, bet he won't make that mistake again.. Originally Posted by canyonman