[QUOTE=nycalcharlie2003;1054868 152]OK. I will risk being blunt - most of the gals here do NOT care about your belly size, dick size, hand size, foot size, etc. let's get real - it is about wallet size! I am not being nasty or rude, I am just being frank*.
Charlie
Truer words have never been spoken.
- Misawahawk
- 01-21-2014, 10:37 AM
- JayceeRivers
- 01-21-2014, 06:31 PM
I admit a generous man does not harm the attraction at all. However Basing a objective opinion on what catches the eye initially can be done. On a purely physical note I don't find overly muscular men attractive at first glance. I imagine they are much like embracing and cuddling one's garden. Uncomfortable. Overly skinny men I find are just as uncomfortable, they also tend to make me feel self conscious. Again all of this can be circumvented by a gentle, kind, polite and generous man.
One must also take into consideration attraction is based on a primal instinct to reproduce. To even out our own genetic faults in our offspring. We could analyze my genetics and say with ease that I am attracted to bigger men because hyperthyroidism runs in my family (obviously I was not burdened with this particular complication myself)
Turning the tables, it would be equally relevant to say most hobbyist are inclined towards the more cost effective. Does that mean he does not find that HDH more attractive? Of course not.
Of course I would not be one to judge the provider for her own primal attraction's no more than I would judge the client who preferred a blond spinner.
On a side note: algrace your comment made me smile. I believed I blushed a little as well.
One must also take into consideration attraction is based on a primal instinct to reproduce. To even out our own genetic faults in our offspring. We could analyze my genetics and say with ease that I am attracted to bigger men because hyperthyroidism runs in my family (obviously I was not burdened with this particular complication myself)
Turning the tables, it would be equally relevant to say most hobbyist are inclined towards the more cost effective. Does that mean he does not find that HDH more attractive? Of course not.
Of course I would not be one to judge the provider for her own primal attraction's no more than I would judge the client who preferred a blond spinner.
On a side note: algrace your comment made me smile. I believed I blushed a little as well.
- ElumEno
- 01-21-2014, 06:38 PM
I admit a generous man does not harm the attraction at all. However Basing a objective opinion on what catches the eye initially can be done. On a purely physical note I don't find overly muscular men attractive at first glance. I imagine they are much like embracing and cuddling one's garden. Uncomfortable. Overly skinny men I find are just as uncomfortable, they also tend to make me feel self conscious. Again all of this can be circumvented by a gentle, kind, polite and generous man.And it is going going gone... you knocked it out of the ballpark!
One must also take into consideration attraction is based on a primal instinct to reproduce. To even out our own genetic faults in our offspring. We could analyze my genetics and say with ease that I am attracted to bigger men because hyperthyroidism runs in my family (obviously I was not burdened with this particular complication myself)
Turning the tables, it would be equally relevant to say most hobbyist are inclined towards the more cost effective. Does that mean he does not find that HDH more attractive? Of course not.
Of course I would not be one to judge the provider for her own primal attraction's no more than I would judge the client who preferred a blond spinner.
On a side note: algrace your comment made me smile. I believed I blushed a little as well. Originally Posted by JayceeRivers
We can close* this one up.. it's done!
*Please DON'T close it - I was only joking