Is there a law concerning ignorance for sticking up for either Trump or Clinton!As I recall one or the other was going to be the next president, I am thankful every day that Crooked Hillery and her crime family lost. America really dodged a bullet.
. Originally Posted by WTF
- goodolboy
- 07-20-2017, 05:03 PM
- WTF
- 07-20-2017, 05:10 PM
- bambino
- 07-20-2017, 05:13 PM
- goodolboy
- 07-20-2017, 05:18 PM
- WTF
- 07-20-2017, 05:18 PM
- bamscram
- 07-20-2017, 05:20 PM
Let's suppose this isn't an attempt at humor.It was, however in this case he is president . So the answer is yes.
Are American owned hotels illegal in moscow? Does the United states have a trade embargo with russia?
Is it illegal for Americans to talk with Russian politicians? Originally Posted by Ross Hecks
- goodolboy
- 07-20-2017, 05:30 PM
It was, however in this case he is president . So the answer is yes. Originally Posted by bamscramPlease provide your source of evidence and list what specific laws were broken.
"The Mueller investigation is limited to possible criminal activity. Probing the moral, political or other non-criminal implications of collusion with, or interference by, Russia is beyond the jurisdiction of the special counsel. It is the role of Congress, not the Criminal Division of the Justice Department, to make changes in existing laws. Perhaps mere collusion by a campaign with a foreign government should be made a crime, so as to prevent future contamination of our elections. But it is not currently a crime.
Nor will it be easy to draft a criminal statute prohibiting a campaign from using material provided by a foreign power, without trenching on the constitutional rights of candidates. But this is all up to Congress and the courts, not the special counsel, with his limited jurisdiction." http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/...t-depends.html
- bamscram
- 07-20-2017, 06:08 PM
Please provide your source of evidence and list what specific laws were broken.You are on the wrong track.
"The Mueller investigation is limited to possible criminal activity. Probing the moral, political or other non-criminal implications of collusion with, or interference by, Russia is beyond the jurisdiction of the special counsel. It is the role of Congress, not the Criminal Division of the Justice Department, to make changes in existing laws. Perhaps mere collusion by a campaign with a foreign government should be made a crime, so as to prevent future contamination of our elections. But it is not currently a crime.
Nor will it be easy to draft a criminal statute prohibiting a campaign from using material provided by a foreign power, without trenching on the constitutional rights of candidates. But this is all up to Congress and the courts, not the special counsel, with his limited jurisdiction." http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/...t-depends.html Originally Posted by goodolboy
https://www.theatlantic.com/business...erests/508382/
http://www.npr.org/2017/06/27/534327...-washington-ho
- goodolboy
- 07-20-2017, 06:25 PM
You are on the wrong track.Good luck with that, we can not expect anyone who runs for public office to sell all their business assets in case they win a term in office.
https://www.theatlantic.com/business...erests/508382/
http://www.npr.org/2017/06/27/534327...-washington-ho Originally Posted by bamscram
“Neither the text nor the history of the clauses shows that they were intended to reach benefits arising from a president’s private business pursuits having nothing to do with his office or personal service to a foreign power," the government said in the filing. “Were plaintiffs’ interpretation correct, presidents from the very beginning of the Republic, including George Washington, would have received prohibited ‘emoluments.’”
The U.S. said Washington gave detailed instructions for the operation of his Mount Vernon plantation, and exported flour and cornmeal to England, Portugal and Jamaica while president. Thomas Jefferson exported tobacco to Great Britain. No concerns were raised over their receiving foreign emoluments. And Barack Obama received royalties on his books, many of which are held in the libraries of foreign public universities, according to the government."
- themystic
- 07-20-2017, 07:08 PM
You seem to be the only one who has seen any evidence of a crime. Why don't you share your evidence, and exactly what law, if any was broken?
"In politics, being innocent is just an advantage. It is not determinative. And although the facts do not support the left’s pursuit of criminal wrongdoing on the part of the Trump clan, Trump Jr. is sure to face a lot of harassment and he may make more mistakes. But that is far from being in the crosshairs of an American law enforcement investigation that could bring down a president. Sorry to the Trump haters for being such a buzz-kill." https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.37b3bf1621c2 Originally Posted by goodolboy
First Team Trump denied any contact with the Russians. Then when meetings were exposed, a new story. If there is nothing to this why is lie after lie being uncovered. As the dots keep connecting, they all seem to connect back to Russia and Trump. Lets see , Paul Manofort steps down as campaign manager, ties to Russia. Sessions recuses himself, ties to Russia, Flynn fired, ties to Russia, etc, etc etc.
Com on GOB. Just admit that you don't give a shit. Thats just how politics are, right? Everyone does it, especially Hillary, right? Russia s not the enemy right? Putin's a great guy. Putin and Trump are going to end the conflict in Syria, right?
- themystic
- 07-20-2017, 07:11 PM
- bambino
- 07-20-2017, 07:13 PM
First Team Trump denied any contact with the Russians. Then when meetings were exposed, a new story. If there is nothing to this why is lie after lie being uncovered. As the dots keep connecting, they all seem to connect back to Russia and Trump. Lets see , Paul Manofort steps down as campaign manager, ties to Russia. Sessions recuses himself, ties to Russia, Flynn fired, ties to Russia, etc, etc etc.They might end the conflict in Syria. At least Putin knows Trump won't think twice about taking out Assads Air Force. Yeah, there's a new sherrif in town and Putin knows it.
Com on GOB. Just admit that you don't give a shit. Thats just how politics are, right? Everyone does it, especially Hillary, right? Russia s not the enemy right? Putin's a great guy. Putin and Trump are going to end the conflict in Syria, right? Originally Posted by themystic
- themystic
- 07-20-2017, 07:20 PM
They might end the conflict in Syria. At least Putin knows Trump won't think twice about taking out Assads Air Force. Yeah, there's a new sherrif in town and Putin knows it. Originally Posted by bambinoOf course Putin knows there is a new sheriff in town. Putin hired him. Trump is on Putin's payroll
Do you really think Putin gives a shit about Assad's AF, lol!!
- bamscram
- 07-20-2017, 07:23 PM
- I B Hankering
- 07-20-2017, 07:28 PM
First Team Trump denied any contact with the Russians. Then when meetings were exposed, a new story. If there is nothing to this why is lie after lie being uncovered. As the dots keep connecting, they all seem to connect back to Russia and Trump. Lets see , Paul Manofort steps down as campaign manager, ties to Russia. Sessions recuses himself, ties to Russia, Flynn fired, ties to Russia, etc, etc etc.
Com on GOB. Just admit that you don't give a shit. Thats just how politics are, right? Everyone does it, especially Hillary, right? Russia s not the enemy right? Putin's a great guy. Putin and Trump are going to end the conflict in Syria, right? Originally Posted by themystic
Was hildebeest a traitor and/or did hildebeest commit a crime when she had surreptitious dealings with the Ukrainians and the Russians, mistake, or are you just a lyin' lib-retarded hypocrite whining because you you voted for the only candidate that Trump could beat?